The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30): Validation of English version in Singapore

被引:0
作者
N. Luo
C. S. L. Fones
S. E. Lim
F. Xie
J. Thumboo
S. C. Li
机构
[1] National University of Singapore,Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science
[2] National University Hospital,Department of Psychological Medicine
[3] National University Hospital,Department of Hematology–Oncology
[4] Singapore General Hospital,Department of Rheumatology and Immunology
[5] National University of Singapore,Department of Medicine
来源
Quality of Life Research | 2005年 / 14卷
关键词
Cancer; EORTC QLQ-C30; Quality of life; Singapore;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to validate the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30, English version 3.0) in Singaporean cancer patients. Methods: In a cross-sectional study, a heterogeneous sample of cancer patients (n = 57) self-administered a questionnaire containing the QLQ-C30, the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and assessing health and sociodemographic status. Construct validity was assessed by testing a priori hypotheses that QLQ-C30 scales would be moderately or strongly correlated with SF-36 scales measuring similar dimensions of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and that subjects reporting mild symptoms would have better HRQoL scores than those reporting severe symptoms. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s α. Results: Strength of Spearman’s correlations between the QLQ-C30 and SF-36 scales assessing similar dimensions of HRQoL ranged from 0.35 to 0.67. Subjects with mild symptoms had better scores than those with severe symptoms for all six QLQ-C30 HRQoL scales (p < 0.05 for five scales, Mann–Whitney U tests). Cronbach’s α ranged from 0.19 for the cognitive functioning scale to 0.91 for the global QoL scale. Conclusion: This study provides preliminary evidence for the validity and reliability of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in English-speaking Singaporean cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1186
页数:5
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Gatsonis C(1989)Multiple correlation: Exact power and sample size calculations Psychol Bull 106 516-524
  • [2] Sampson AR.(2000)SF-36 health survey update Spine 25 3130-3139
  • [3] Ware JE(2000)The performance of SF-36 health survey in patients with laryngeal cancer. Head and Neck Cancer Italian Working Group Head Neck 22 175-182
  • [4] Mosconi P(1999)Validation of the MOS SF-36 for quality of life assessment of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in Singapore J Rheumatol 26 97-102
  • [5] Cifani S(2003)Validation of English and Chinese versions of the SQLS, SF-36 and HU13 in patients with schizophrenia in Singapore Value Health 6 360-188
  • [6] Crispino S(2001)A community-based study of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the English (UK) and Chinese (HK) SF-36 in Singapore Qual Life Res 10 175-557
  • [7] Thumboo J(1998)Evaluation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire: A comparison with SF-36 Health Survey in a cohort of Italian long-survival cancer patients Ann Oncol 9 549-348
  • [8] Fong KY(2002)The comparability of quality of life scores: A multitrait multimethod analysis of the EORTC QLQ-C30, SF-36 and FLIC questionnaires Eur J Cancer 38 339-98
  • [9] Ng TP(2003)Quality of life in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35 Qual Life Res 12 93-735
  • [10] Luo N(2003)Quality of life of breast cancer patients in Taiwan: Validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 Psychooncology 12 729-262