A microcosting study of microsurgery, LINAC radiosurgery, and gamma knife radiosurgery in meningioma patients

被引:0
作者
Siok Swan Tan
Erik van Putten
Wideke M. Nijdam
Patrick Hanssens
Guus N. Beute
Peter J. Nowak
Clemens M. Dirven
Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen
机构
[1] Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam,Department of Neurosurgery
[2] Institute for Medical Technology Assessment,Department of Radiation Oncology
[3] Erasmus MC University Medical Center,undefined
[4] Erasmus MC University Medical Center,undefined
[5] St. Elisabeth Hospital,undefined
[6] Gamma Knife Center,undefined
来源
Journal of Neuro-Oncology | 2011年 / 101卷
关键词
Cost comparison; Meningioma; Microcosting; Microsurgery; Radiosurgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of the present study is to determine and compare initial treatment costs of microsurgery, linear accelerator (LINAC) radiosurgery, and gamma knife radiosurgery in meningioma patients. Additionally, the follow-up costs in the first year after initial treatment were assessed. Cost analyses were performed at two neurosurgical departments in The Netherlands from the healthcare providers’ perspective. A total of 59 patients were included, of whom 18 underwent microsurgery, 15 underwent LINAC radiosurgery, and 26 underwent gamma knife radiosurgery. A standardized microcosting methodology was employed to ensure that the identified cost differences would reflect only actual cost differences. Initial treatment costs, using equipment costs per fraction, were €12,288 for microsurgery, €1,547 for LINAC radiosurgery, and €2,412 for gamma knife radiosurgery. Higher initial treatment costs for microsurgery were predominantly due to inpatient stay (€5,321) and indirect costs (€4,350). LINAC and gamma knife radiosurgery were equally expensive when equipment was valued per treatment (€2,198 and €2,412, respectively). Follow-up costs were slightly, but not significantly, higher for microsurgery compared with LINAC and gamma knife radiosurgery. Even though initial treatment costs were over five times higher for microsurgery compared with both radiosurgical treatments, our study gives indications that the relative cost difference may decrease when follow-up costs occurring during the first year after initial treatment are incorporated. This reinforces the need to consider follow-up costs after initial treatment when examining the relative costs of alternative treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 245
页数:8
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Riemenschneider MJ(2006)Histological classification and molecular genetics of meningiomas Lancet Neurol 5 1045-1054
[2]  
Perry A(2007)Intracranial meningiomas: an overview of diagnosis and treatment Neurosurg Focus 23 E1-85
[3]  
Reifenberger G(2009)Meningiomas in 2009: controversies and future challenges Am J Clin Oncol 32 73-109
[4]  
Rockhill J(2007)The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system Acta Neuropathol 114 97-214
[5]  
Mrugala M(2003)Treatment of meningioma: an update Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 3 206-1224
[6]  
Chamberlain MC(2008)Comparison of the surgical and follow-up costs associated with microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma J Neurosurg 108 1220-29
[7]  
Campbell BA(2007)The economics of brain metastases Cancer Treat Res 136 23-255
[8]  
Jhamb A(2003)Direct costs of microsurgical management of radiosurgically amenable intracranial pathology in Germany: an analysis of meningiomas, acoustic neuromas, metastases and arteriovenous malformations of less than 3 cm in diameter Acta Neurochir (Wien) 145 249-494
[9]  
Maguire JA(2007)Stereotactic radiation treatment for benign meningiomas Neurosurg Focus 23 E5-543
[10]  
Toyota B(2007)Cost analysis of Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery Int J Technol Assess Health Care 23 488-873