Evaluation of earthquake-induced landslides hazard zonation methods: a case study of Sarein, Iran, earthquake (1997)

被引:0
作者
S. M. Fatemi Aghda
V. Bagheri
机构
[1] Kharazmi University,Department of applied Geology, Faculty of Geological Science
来源
Arabian Journal of Geosciences | 2015年 / 8卷
关键词
Earthquake; Seismic landslides; Fuzzy logic; Regional landslide hazard zonation; GIS; Evaluation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Landslides, in general, and seismic landslides, specifically, are among the phenomena that caused a huge loss to the humans over the past years. In this research, one of the novel methods for seismic landslides hazard zonation, a comprehensive areal model of earthquake-induced landslides (CAMEL), is applied to predict the concentration and hazard induced by the landslides and evaluate these landslides by the quantitative approaches. In this regard, the zone affected by the Mw = 6.1 Sarein earthquake (1997) was selected as the model area. At first, the necessary information including disturbance distance (distance from river and road), ground strength class, ground moisture, shaking intensity, slope angle, slope height, soil depth, terrain roughness, material type, and vegetation were collected using aerial photos, Landsat satellite images, geological and topographic maps, and site investigation of the studied region. These data were digitized and weighed using the digital geographic information system (GIS) in a comparative manner, and then concentration and hazard of the seismic landslides were predicted using the CAMEL program. Next, by empirical comparing the landslides triggered by Sarein earthquake and the predicted concentration, the accuracy of this technique was evaluated. It can be inferred that CAMEL predicts soil landslides concentration more efficient than rock landslides. For rock slumps and block slides, CAMEL’s performance was slightly poorer. The model predicted a low occurrence of rock slumps and block slides, when none in fact occurred. A similar comparison with the Sarein case study was also conducted using a quantitative method. The accuracy of both quantitative and CAMEL approaches was evaluated using the quantitative zonation, revealing improved performance with CAMEL.
引用
收藏
页码:7207 / 7227
页数:20
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Hancox G(2002)Recent studies of historical earthquake-induced landsliding, ground damage, and MMI intensity in New Zealand Bull N Z Soc Earthq Eng 35 59-95
[2]  
Perrin N(1980)Empirical strength criterion for rock masses Geotech and Geotech Eng Div, ASCE 106 (GT9) 15715 1013-1035
[3]  
Dellow G(2000)A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps Eng Geol 58 271-289
[4]  
Hoek E(1984)Landslides caused by earthquakes Geol Soc Am Bull 95 406-421
[5]  
Brown ET(1993)The susceptibility of rock slopes to earthquake-induced failure Assoc of Eng Geol Bull 30 406-421
[6]  
Jibson RW(2000)Statistical analysis of an earthquake-induced landslide distribution—the 1989 Loma Prieta, California event Eng Geol 58 231-249
[7]  
Harp EL(1998)Using GIS in the probabilistic assessment of earthquake triggered landslide hazards J Earthq Eng 2 593-623
[8]  
Michael JA(2010)Participatory model assessment of earthquake-induced landslide hazard models Nat Hazards 56 749-766
[9]  
Keefer DK(2009)Evaluation of CAMEL—comprehensive areal model of earthquake-induced landslides Eng Geol 104 1-15
[10]  
Keefer DK(2009)Toward a comprehensive areal model of earthquake-induced landslides Nat Hazards 10 19-28