Brain Dynamics of Distractibility: Interaction Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mechanisms of Auditory Attention

被引:0
作者
Aurélie Bidet-Caulet
Laure Bottemanne
Clara Fonteneau
Marie-Hélène Giard
Olivier Bertrand
机构
[1] University of Lyon 1,Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; CRNL, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292
来源
Brain Topography | 2015年 / 28卷
关键词
Novelty; Involuntary attention; Unexpected sound; Distraction; Arousal;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Attention improves the processing of specific information while other stimuli are disregarded. A good balance between bottom-up (attentional capture by unexpected salient stimuli) and top-down (selection of relevant information) mechanisms is crucial to be both task-efficient and aware of our environment. Only few studies have explored how an isolated unexpected task-irrelevant stimulus outside the attention focus can disturb the top-down attention mechanisms necessary to the good performance of the ongoing task, and how these top-down mechanisms can modulate the bottom-up mechanisms of attentional capture triggered by an unexpected event. We recorded scalp electroencephalography in 18 young adults performing a new paradigm measuring distractibility and assessing both bottom-up and top-down attention mechanisms, at the same time. Increasing task load in top-down attention was found to reduce early processing of the distracting sound, but not bottom-up attentional capture mechanisms nor the behavioral distraction cost in reaction time. Moreover, the impact of bottom-up attentional capture by distracting sounds on target processing was revealed as a delayed latency of the N100 sensory response to target sounds mirroring increased reaction times. These results provide crucial information into how bottom-up and top-down mechanisms dynamically interact and compete in the human brain, i.e. on the precarious balance between voluntary attention and distraction.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 436
页数:13
相关论文
共 246 条
  • [21] Knight RT(2001)The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25 355-1557
  • [22] Brunia CH(2000)Neurophysiological mechanisms of auditory selective attention in humans Front Biosci 5 D84-47
  • [23] van Boxtel GJ(2005)Developmental changes in refractoriness of the cortical auditory evoked potential Clin Neurophysiol 116 648-569
  • [24] Ceponiene R(2002)Preparatory slow potentials and event-related potentials in an auditory cued attention task Clin Neurophysiol 113 1544-60
  • [25] Lepisto T(2007)Fronto-parietal networks activation during the contingent negative variation period Brain Res Bull 73 40-180
  • [26] Soininen M(1982)Interstimulus interval dependence on the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: implications for their neural generation Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 54 561-152
  • [27] Aronen E(2000)Primary task demands modulate P3a amplitude Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 9 53-147
  • [28] Alku P(1973)Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain Science 182 177-32
  • [29] Naatanen R(2006)Brain responses to a subject’s own name uttered by a familiar voice Brain Res 1082 142-45
  • [30] Corbetta M(2013)Sensory ERP effects in auditory distraction: did we miss the main event? Psychol Res 79 139-259