Brain Dynamics of Distractibility: Interaction Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mechanisms of Auditory Attention

被引:0
作者
Aurélie Bidet-Caulet
Laure Bottemanne
Clara Fonteneau
Marie-Hélène Giard
Olivier Bertrand
机构
[1] University of Lyon 1,Brain Dynamics and Cognition Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center; CRNL, INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292
来源
Brain Topography | 2015年 / 28卷
关键词
Novelty; Involuntary attention; Unexpected sound; Distraction; Arousal;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Attention improves the processing of specific information while other stimuli are disregarded. A good balance between bottom-up (attentional capture by unexpected salient stimuli) and top-down (selection of relevant information) mechanisms is crucial to be both task-efficient and aware of our environment. Only few studies have explored how an isolated unexpected task-irrelevant stimulus outside the attention focus can disturb the top-down attention mechanisms necessary to the good performance of the ongoing task, and how these top-down mechanisms can modulate the bottom-up mechanisms of attentional capture triggered by an unexpected event. We recorded scalp electroencephalography in 18 young adults performing a new paradigm measuring distractibility and assessing both bottom-up and top-down attention mechanisms, at the same time. Increasing task load in top-down attention was found to reduce early processing of the distracting sound, but not bottom-up attentional capture mechanisms nor the behavioral distraction cost in reaction time. Moreover, the impact of bottom-up attentional capture by distracting sounds on target processing was revealed as a delayed latency of the N100 sensory response to target sounds mirroring increased reaction times. These results provide crucial information into how bottom-up and top-down mechanisms dynamically interact and compete in the human brain, i.e. on the precarious balance between voluntary attention and distraction.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 436
页数:13
相关论文
共 246 条
  • [1] Aguera PE(2011)ELAN: a software package for analysis and visualization of MEG, EEG, and LFP signals Comput Intell Neurosci 2011 158970-615
  • [2] Jerbi K(1994)Two separate frontal components in the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked response Psychophysiology 31 611-136
  • [3] Caclin A(2011)Single-trial event-related potentials and the orienting reflex to monaural tones Int J Psychophysiol 79 127-9261
  • [4] Bertrand O(2013)The role of auditory transient and deviance processing in distraction of task performance: a combined behavioral and event-related brain potential study Front Hum Neurosci 7 352-284
  • [5] Alcaini M(2007)Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representation of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex J Neurosci 27 9252-75
  • [6] Giard MH(2010)Load effects in auditory selective attention: evidence for distinct facilitation and inhibition mechanisms Neuroimage 50 277-141
  • [7] Thevenet M(2001)Wait and see Int J Psychophysiol 43 59-215
  • [8] Pernier J(2004)Event-related potentials associated with sound discrimination versus novelty detection in children Psychophysiology 41 130-1539
  • [9] Barry RJ(2002)Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain Nat Rev Neurosci 3 201-361
  • [10] Macdonald B(2008)Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction NeuroReport 19 1535-206