Farmers' definitions, goals, and bottlenecks of sustainable agriculture in the North-Central Region

被引:14
作者
Biggelaar C.D. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,13 ]
Suvedi M. [2 ,5 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ,11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC
[2] Department of Agricultural and Natural Resources Education and Communication Systems, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI
[3] Department of Agroecology, Appalachian State University
[4] Agricultural College, Den Bosch
[5] Department of Agricultural and Natural Resources Education and Communication Systems, Michigan State University
[6] University of the Philippines, Los Banos
[7] Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University
[8] Department of Interdisciplinary Studies, Appalachian State University, Boone
关键词
Definitions of sustainability; Evaluation; Farm goals; Problems and bottlenecks; Sustainable agriculture;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026584105482
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Since its inception in 1988, the SARE program has sponsored hundreds of projects to explore and apply economically viable, environmentally sound, and socially acceptable farming systems. Recognizing that researchers often collaborated with producers and that producer interest in sustainable agriculture was increasing, SARE's North-Central Region began directly funding farmers and ranchers in 1992 to test their own ideas on sustainable agriculture. The present article is based on data from the formative evaluation of the first five years (1992 to 1996) of the NCR-SARE Producer Grant Program. The evaluation used a combination of mail surveys, non-response telephone interviews, and personal interviews. The evaluation revealed that the Program has succeeded in showing that sustainable agricultural technologies and practices can be viable and profitable alternatives to conventional ways of producing crops and animals while simultaneously being less environmentally damaging. On the other hand, the contributions of the Producer Grant Program to the social and institutional spheres in which agriculture is embedded are less clear. Changes in these spheres are imperative for the success of sustainable agriculture, and for it to become more mainstream. Such changes cannot occur overnight, but they will remain the main challenge for SARE to tackle in the near future. © 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 358
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Allen, J.C., Johnson, B.J., (1996) Quality of Life Effects of Conventional, Transitional and Sustainable Production Systems on Rural Communities and Family Farms in the Western Corn Belt, , Final Report to NCR-SARE (LNC94-65)
[2]  
Allen, P., Van Dusen, D., Lundy, J., Gliessman, S., Integrating social, environmental and economic issues in sustainable agriculture (1991) American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 6 (1), pp. 34-39
[3]  
Altieri, M.A., (1983) Agroecology. The Scientific Basis of Alternative Agriculture, , Berkeley: University of California, Division of Biological Control
[4]  
Den Biggelaar, C., Suvedi, M., (1998) An Evaluation of the North-Central Region SARE Producer Grant Program, , East Lansing, Michigan: AEE Center for Evaluative Studies
[5]  
Chu, H., Yellow River giving China sorrow (1999) Los Angeles Times, pp. A1. , February 18, 1999
[6]  
Cocklin, C., Agriculture, society and environment: Discourses on sustainability (1995) International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2 (4), pp. 240-256
[7]  
Dillman, D.A., (1978) Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method, , New York: Wiley
[8]  
Francis, C.A., Youngberg, G., Sustainable agriculture: An overview (1990) Sustainable Agriculture in Temperate Zones, pp. 1-23. , C. A. Francis, B. Flora, and L. D. King (eds.), New York: Wiley
[9]  
Ikerd, J.E., (1996) Evaluating Relative Impacts of Conventional and Sustainable Farming System on Rural Communities, , Final Report to NCR-SARE (LNC92-48)
[10]  
Ikerd, J., Devino, G., Traiyongwanich, S., Evaluating the sustainability of alternative farming systems: A case study (1996) American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 11 (1), pp. 25-29