Comparison of the Glidescope® and Pentax AWS® laryngoscopes to the Macintosh laryngoscope for use by Advanced Paramedics in easy and simulated difficult intubation

被引:47
作者
Nasim S. [1 ]
Maharaj C.H. [2 ]
Malik M.A. [1 ,4 ]
O'Donnell J. [3 ]
Higgins B.D. [4 ]
Laffey J.G. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Anaesthesia, Galway University Hospitals, Galway
[2] Department of Anaesthesia, Sligo General Hospital, Sligo
[3] Department of Emergency Medicine, Galway University Hospitals, Galway
[4] Department of Anaesthesia, Clinical Sciences Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway
关键词
Tracheal Intubation; Prehospital Setting; Intubation Attempt; Dental Trauma; Macintosh Laryngoscope;
D O I
10.1186/1471-227X-9-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Intubation of the trachea in the pre-hospital setting may be lifesaving in severely ill and injured patients. However, tracheal intubation is frequently difficult to perform in this challenging environment, is associated with a lower success rate, and failed tracheal intubation constitutes an important cause of morbidity. Novel indirect laryngoscopes, such as the Glidescope® and the AWS® laryngoscopes may reduce this risk. Methods: We compared the efficacy of these devices to the Macintosh laryngoscope when used by 25 Advanced Paramedics proficient in direct laryngoscopy, in a randomized, controlled, manikin study. Following brief didactic instruction with the Glidescope® and the AWS® laryngoscopes, each participant took turns performing laryngoscopy and intubation with each device, in an easy intubation scenario and following placement of a hard cervical collar, in a SimMan® manikin. Results: Both the Glidescope® and the AWS® performed better than the Macintosh, and demonstrate considerable promise in this context. The AWS® had the least number of dental compressions in all three scenarios, and in the cervical spine immobilization scenario it required fewer maneuvers to optimize the view of the glottis. Conclusion: The Glidescope® and AWS® devices possess advantages over the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope when used by Advanced Paramedics in normal and simulated difficult intubation scenarios in this manikin study. Further studies are required to extend these findings to the clinical setting. © 2009 Nasim et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Winchell R.J., Hoyt D.B., Endotracheal intubation in the field improves survival in patients with severe head injury, Arch Surg, 132, 6, pp. 592-597, (1997)
[2]  
Garner A., Rashford S., Lee A., Bartolacci R., Addition of physicians to paramedic helicopter services decreases blunt trauma mortality, Aust N Z J Surg, 69, 10, pp. 697-701, (1999)
[3]  
Sanson G., Di Bartolomeo S., Nardi G., Albanese P., Diani A., Raffin L., Filippetto C., Cattarossi A., Scian E., Rizzi L., Road traffic accidents with vehicular entrapment: Incidence of major injuries and need for advanced life support, Eur J Emerg Med, 6, 4, pp. 285-291, (1999)
[4]  
Mort T.C., Esophageal intubation with indirect clinical tests during emergency tracheal intubation: A report on patient morbidity, J Clin Anesth, 17, 4, pp. 255-262, (2005)
[5]  
Mort T.C., Emergency tracheal intubation: Complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts, Anesth Analg, 99, 2, pp. 607-613, (2004)
[6]  
Agro F., Barzoi G., Montecchia F., Tracheal intubation using a Macintosh laryngoscope or a GlideScope in 15 patients with cervical spine immobilization, Br J Anaesth, 90, 5, pp. 705-706, (2003)
[7]  
Sun D.A., Warriner C.B., Parsons D.G., Klein R., Umedaly H.S., Moult M., The GlideScope Video Laryngoscope: Randomized clinical trial in 200 patients, Br J Anaesth, 94, 3, pp. 381-384, (2005)
[8]  
Malik C.H., Harte B.H., Laffey J.G., Comparison of Macintosh, Truview EVO2, Glidescope, and Airwayscope laryngoscope use in patients with cervical spine immobilization, Br J Anaesth, 101, 5, pp. 723-730, (2008)
[9]  
Cooper R.M., Pacey J.A., Bishop M.J., McCluskey S.A., Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients, Can J Anaesth, 52, 2, pp. 191-198, (2005)
[10]  
Enomoto Y., Asai T., Arai T., Kamishima K., Okuda Y., Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: A randomized comparative study, Br J Anaesth, 100, 4, pp. 544-548, (2008)