How and when does abusive supervision influence employees’ promotive and prohibitive voice?

被引：0
作者：
Jun Yang
Xiao-Hua (Frank) Wang
Darren C. Treadway
Yonghong Liu
机构：
[1] University of North Carolina,Bryan School of Business and Economics
[2] Beijing Normal University,Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education, Faculty of Psychology
[3] Niagara University,undefined
来源：
Current Psychology | 2024年 / 43卷
关键词：
Abusive supervision; Promotive voice; Prohibitive voice; Voice self-efficacy; Psychological resilience; Moral disengagement propensity;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In this study, we explore how and when abusive supervision may dampen two types of voice behavior: promotive and prohibitive voice. Drawing on social cognitive theory, we propose that employee voice self-efficacy (VSE) may mediate the negative relationships between abusive supervision and promotive/prohibitive voice. Furthermore, according to the conservation of resources theory, we argue that employees’ psychological resilience may buffer the negative indirect effects of abusive supervision on the two voice behaviors via follower VSE. Third, we propose that employees’ moral disengagement propensity (MDP) may attenuate the moderating effects of resilience, such that the buffering effects of resilience may occur only when MDP is low. We tested our conditional process model with time-lagged and multisource data collected from 656 employees and 99 supervisors in China. The results largely supported our hypotheses. Theoretical contributions and practical implications are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码：1457 / 1472
页数：15
相关论文
共 253 条
  • [1] Aryee S(2008)Abusive supervision and contextual performance: the mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of work unit structure Management and Organization Review 4 393-411
  • [2] Sun LY(1998)Out on a limb: the role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues Administrative Science Quarterly 43 23-57
  • [3] Chen ZXG(1990)Selective activation and disengagement of moral control Journal of Social Issues 46 27-46
  • [4] Debrah YA(1999)Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities Personality and Social Psychology Review 3 193-209
  • [5] Ashford SJ(2002)Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency Journal of Moral Education 31 101-119
  • [6] Rothbard NP(2018)Toward a psychology of human agency: pathways and reflections Perspectives on Psychological Science 13 130-136
  • [7] Piderit SK(2006)Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: new procedures and recommendations Psychological Methods 11 142-163
  • [8] Dutton JE(1987)Practical issues in structural modeling Sociological Methods & Research 16 78-117
  • [9] Bandura A(1996)IQ and ego-resiliency: conceptual and empirical connections and separateness Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 70 349-361
  • [10] Bandura A(2016)How much do we really know about employee resilience? Industrial and Organizational Psychology 9 378-404
12345678910