The COVID-19 pandemic: a case for epistemic pluralism in public health policy

被引：0

作者：

Simon Lohse

Karim Bschir

机构：

[1] Leibniz University Hannover,Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences (CELLS) and Institute of Philosophy

[2] University of St. Gallen,School of Humanities and Social Sciences

来源：

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences | 2020年 / 42卷

关键词：

Evidence-based policy; Paul Feyerabend; Expertise;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This paper uses the example of the COVID-19 pandemic to analyse the danger associated with insufficient epistemic pluralism in evidence-based public health policy. Drawing on certain elements in Paul Feyerabend’s political philosophy of science, it discusses reasons for implementing more pluralism as well as challenges to be tackled on the way forward.

引用

共 8 条

[1]

Adam D(2020)Special report: The simulations driving the world’s response to COVID-19 Nature 580 316-318

[2]

Caduff C(2020)What went wrong Corona and the world after the full stop Medical Anthropology Quarterly 81 31-59

[3]

Frigg R(2014)Laplace’s demon and the adventures of his apprentices Philosophy of Science 14 31-49

[4]

Bradley S(2020)Complex social networks are missing in the dominant COVID-19 epidemic models Sociologica undefined undefined-undefined

[5]

Du H(2020)Feyerabend and manufactured disagreement: Reflections on expertise, consensus, and science policy Synthese undefined undefined-undefined

[6]

Smith LA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

[7]

Manzo G(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

[8]

Shaw J(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

← 1 →