Establishment and Short-term Productivity of Annual and Perennial Bioenergy Crops Across a Landscape Gradient

被引:0
作者
Danielle M. Wilson
Emily A. Heaton
Lisa A. Schulte
Theodore P. Gunther
Monika E. Shea
Richard B. Hall
William Landon Headlee
Kenneth J. Moore
Nicholas N. Boersma
机构
[1] Iowa State University,Department of Agronomy
[2] Iowa State University,Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
[3] Iowa Soybean Association,undefined
来源
BioEnergy Research | 2014年 / 7卷
关键词
Biofuels; Biomass yield; Hybrid aspen; Landscape Biomass Project; Short-rotation woody crops; Sorghum; Switchgrass;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bioenergy crops may help achieve multiple energy, economic, and environmental objectives in the US Midwest, but a portfolio of crops must first be developed and tested in comparison to the current standard, maize (Zea mays L.). The nascent, but long-term and ongoing Landscape Biomass Project in Boone County, Iowa, USA examines five cropping systems including continuous maize, a modified maize–soy [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation, nurse cropped maize–switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), double-cropped triticale (Triticosecale × Whit.)/sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), and intercropped triticale–aspen (Crandon [Populus alba × Populus grandidentata]) over an elevation gradient. Here, we report perennial establishment and crop productivity across five landscape positions during the first 4 years (2009–2012) of this experiment. Perennials (switchgrass and aspen) established successfully across the gradient with minimal effect of landscape position. Continuous maize had the highest biomass yields both within and over growing seasons, but they declined over time. In comparison, the diversified and perennial systems had lower, but stable or increasing yields over time, despite extreme weather conditions. Landscape position did not consistently influence biomass yield; its effect depended on year and cropping system. Cropping system productivity was generally consistent across the landscape within a given year with greater variability between years. Findings help explain why landscape is often disregarded in Midwestern crop management: it does not seem to substantially drive crop, and thus economic, performance in the short term. Conversely, related Landscape Biomass studies find landscape influences important ecosystem functions (e.g., soil carbon storage) and should be an integral management consideration.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 898
页数:13
相关论文
共 198 条
[1]  
Heaton EA(2013)Managing a second-generation crop portfolio through sustainable intensification: examples from the USA and the EU Biofpr 325 270-271
[2]  
Schulte LA(2009)Beneficial biofuels: the food, energy, and environment trilemma Science 309 570-574
[3]  
Berti M(2005)Global consequences of land use Science 61 164A-169A
[4]  
Langeveld H(2006)Agroecosystem restoration through strategic integration of perennials J Soil Water Conserv 110 4134-4139
[5]  
Zegada-Lizarazu W(2013)Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands PNAS 105 295-303
[6]  
Parrish D(2013)Identifying factors controlling the continuous corn yield penalty Agron J 8 104-117
[7]  
Monti A(2013)Farm-scale costs and returns for second-generation bioenergy cropping systems in the U.S. Corn Belt Environ Res Lett 115 85-91
[8]  
Tilman D(2012)Double cropping effects on forage yield and the field water balance Agric Water Manag 127 851-868
[9]  
Socolow R(2013)Long-term rotation and tillage effects on soil structure and crop yield Soil Tillage Res 34 103-113
[10]  
Foley JA(2010)Switchgrass selection as a “model” bioenergy crop: a history of the process Biomass Bioenergy 6 285-294