Superconducting gap evolution of kagome metal CsV3Sb5 under pressure

被引:0
作者
Dongting Zhang
Chufan Chen
Lichang Yin
Yan’En Huang
Fengrui Shi
Yi Liu
Xiaofeng Xu
Huiqiu Yuan
Xin Lu
机构
[1] Zhejiang University,Center for Correlated Matter and Department of Physics
[2] Zhejiang University of Technology,Key Laboratory of Quantum Precision Measurement of Zhejiang Province, Department of Applied Physics
[3] Zhejiang University,Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Quantum Technology and Device, Department of Physics
[4] Zhejiang University,State Key Laboratory of Silicon Materials
[5] Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures,undefined
来源
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy | 2023年 / 66卷
关键词
high pressure; point contact spectroscopy; multiband; CsV; Sb; 71.27.+a; 71.30.+h; 72.15.Qm; 74.50.+r;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Kagome superconductors AV3Sb5 (A=Cs, V, Sb) have served as an ideal platform to unveil the intriguing competitions between charge-density-wave (CDW), superconductivity and possible nontrivial topological states. We report soft point-contact spectroscopy (SPCS) studies on CsV3Sb5 under pressure up to 2.5 GPa. Its superconducting transition temperature Tc and gaps for SPCS at pressure P = 0.1 GPa suggest the absence of the adverse local strain effect as observed in point-contacts at ambient pressure, while the SPCS-determined Tc under hydrostatic pressure deviates from the reported double dome feature below 2.5 GPa. Three distinct gap values in CsV3Sb5 are proposed to exist through the whole pressure range with 2Δ1/kBTc≤1, 2Δ2/kBTc∼2.3 -3.0 and 2Δ3/kBTc>3.5. The two smaller gaps for 2Δ1/kBTc≤1 and 2Δ2/kBTc∼2.3–3.0 are robust under pressure, while there is no trace of the largest gap 2Δ3/kBTc>3.5 for SPCS in the c direction with P ≤ P1 = 0.7 GPa and P ≥ P2 = 2.0 GPa and it becomes observable in the pressure range of (P1, P2), suggesting a complex relation between CDW and superconductivity between (P1, P2).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 218 条
[1]  
Ortiz B R(2020)undefined Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 247002-undefined
[2]  
Teicher S M L(2022)undefined Sci. Bull. 67 495-undefined
[3]  
Hu Y(2021)undefined Phys. Rev. B 104 075148-undefined
[4]  
Zuo J L(2021)undefined Nat. Commun. 12 3645-undefined
[5]  
Sarte P M(2021)undefined Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 247001-undefined
[6]  
Schueller E C(2021)undefined Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 64 107462-undefined
[7]  
Abeykoon A M M(2021)undefined Chin. Phys. Lett. 38 077402-undefined
[8]  
Krogstad M J(2021)undefined Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 187004-undefined
[9]  
Rosenkranz S(2021)undefined npj Quantum Mater. 7 49-undefined
[10]  
Osborn R(2021)undefined Phys. Rev. X 11 031026-undefined