Bone density and pain response following intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for vertebral metastases - secondary results of a randomized trial

被引:17
作者
Sprave, Tanja [1 ,3 ]
Verma, Vivek [2 ]
Foerster, Robert [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Schlampp, Ingmar [1 ,3 ]
Hees, Katharina [2 ,5 ]
Bruckner, Thomas [2 ,5 ]
Bostel, Tilman [1 ]
El Shafie, Rami Ateyah [1 ,3 ]
Welzel, Thomas [1 ]
Nicolay, Nils Henrik [1 ,3 ,6 ]
Debus, Juergen [1 ,3 ]
Rief, Harald [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Dept Radiat Oncol, Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[3] HIRO, Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Radiat Oncol, Raemistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[5] Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Dept Med Biometry, Neuenheimer Feld 305, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[6] Univ Hosp Freiburg, Dept Radiat Oncol, Robert Koch Str 3, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2018年 / 13卷
关键词
Bone metastases; Spine; Intensity-modulated radiation therapy; Bone density; Palliative radiotherapy; PROSTATE-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; PILOT TRIAL; RADIATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; FREQUENCY; ABSCOPAL; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-018-1161-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundThis was a prespecified secondary analysis of a randomized trial that analyzed bone density and pain response following fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) for palliative management of spinal metastases.Methods/materialsSixty patients were enrolled in the single-institutional randomized exploratory trial, randomly assigned to receive IMRT or 3DCRT (30Gy in 10 fractions). Along with pain response (measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Chow criteria), quantitative bone density was evaluated at baseline, 3, and 6months in both irradiated and unirradiated spinal bodies, along with rates of pathologic fractures and vertebral compression fractures.ResultsRelative to baseline, bone density increased at 3 and 6months following IMRT by a median of 24.8% and 33.8%, respectively (p<0.01 and p=0.048). These figures in the 3DCRT cohort were 18.5% and 48.4%, respectively (p<0.01 for both). There were no statistical differences in bone density between IMRT and 3DCRT at 3 (p=0.723) or 6months (p=0.341). Subgroup analysis of osteolytic and osteoblastic metastases showed no differences between groups; however, mixed metastases showed an increase in bone density over baseline in the IMRT (but not 3DCRT) arm. The 3-month rate of the pathological fractures was 15.0% in the IMRT arm vs. 10.5% in the 3DCRT arm. There were no differences in pathological fractures at 3 (p=0.676) and 6 (p=1.000) months. The IMRT arm showed improved VAS scores at 3 (p=0.037) but not 6months (p=0.430). Using Chow criteria, pain response was similar at both 3 (p=0.395) and 6 (p=0.732) months.ConclusionsThis the first prospective investigation evaluating the impact of IMRT vs. 3DCRT on bone density. Along with pain response and pathologic fracture rates, significant rises in bone density after 3 and 6months were similar in both cohorts. Future randomized investigations with larger sample sizes are recommended.Trial registrationNCT, NCT02832830. Registered 14 July 2016
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Abscopal, immunological effects of radiotherapy: Narrowing the gap between clinical and preclinical experiences
    Brix, Nikko
    Tiefenthaller, Anna
    Anders, Heike
    Belka, Claus
    Lauber, Kirsten
    [J]. IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2017, 280 (01) : 249 - 279
  • [2] International consensus on palliative radiotherapy endpoints for future clinical trials in bone metastases
    Chow, E
    Wu, JSY
    Hoskin, P
    Coia, LR
    Bentzen, SM
    Blitzer, PH
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 64 (03) : 275 - 280
  • [3] Daimon T, 2016, AM J CLIN EXP UROL, V4, P28
  • [4] Eggermont F, 2017, ADV RADIAT ONCOL, V2, P53, DOI 10.1016/j.adro.2016.11.001
  • [5] The effect of radiotherapy, and radiotherapy combined with bisphosphonates or RANK ligand inhibitors on bone quality in bone metastases. A systematic review
    Groenen, Karlijn H. J.
    Pouw, Martin H.
    Hannink, Gerjon
    Hosman, Allard J. F.
    van der Linden, Yvette M.
    Verdonschot, Nico
    Tanck, Esther
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 (02) : 194 - 201
  • [6] Koswig S, 1999, STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, V175, P10, DOI 10.1007/BF02743455
  • [7] Abscopal effect of radiation on bone metastases of breast cancer: A case report
    Leung, Henry W. C.
    Wang, Shyh-Yau
    Jin-Jhih, Huang
    Chan, Agnes L. F.
    [J]. CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY, 2018, 19 (01) : 20 - 24
  • [8] USE OF NORMAL TISSUE COMPLICATION PROBABILITY MODELS IN THE CLINIC
    Marks, Lawrence B.
    Yorke, Ellen D.
    Jackson, Andrew
    Ten Haken, Randall K.
    Constine, Louis S.
    Eisbruch, Avraham
    Bentzen, Soren M.
    Nam, Jiho
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (03): : S10 - S19
  • [9] McQuay HJ, 2000, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V2
  • [10] Radiation-induced toxicity after image-guided and intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus external beam radiotherapy for patients with spinal bone metastases (IRON-1): a study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial
    Meyerhof, Eva
    Sprave, Tanja
    Welte, Stefan Ezechiel
    Nicolay, Nils H.
    Foerster, Robert
    Bostel, Tilman
    Bruckner, Thomas
    Schlampp, Ingmar
    Debus, Juergen
    Rief, Harald
    [J]. TRIALS, 2017, 18