Examining Walkability and Social Capital as Indicators of Quality of Life at the Municipal and Neighborhood Scales

被引:0
作者
Shannon H. Rogers
John M. Halstead
Kevin H. Gardner
Cynthia H. Carlson
机构
[1] University of New Hampshire,Natural Resources and Earth Systems Science Program
[2] University of New Hampshire,Environmental Research Group
[3] University of New Hampshire,Department of Natural Resources and the Environment
[4] University of New Hampshire,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
来源
Applied Research in Quality of Life | 2011年 / 6卷
关键词
Social capital; Walkability; Built environment; Neighborhood scale;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Walkability has been linked to quality of life in many ways. Health related benefits of physical exercise, the accessibility and access benefits of being able to walk to obtain some of your daily needs, or the mental health and social benefits of reduced isolation are a few of the many positive impacts on quality of life that can result from a walkable neighborhood. In the age of increasing energy costs and climate considerations, the ability to walk to important locations is a key component of sustainable communities. While the health and environmental implications of walkable communities are being extensively studied, the social benefits have not been investigated as broadly. Social capital is a measure of an individual’s or group’s networks, personal connections, and involvement. Like economic and human capital, social capital is considered to have important values to both individuals and communities. Through a case study approach this article argues that the generation and maintenance of social capital is another important component of quality of life that may be facilitated by living in a walkable community. Residents living in neighborhoods of varying built form and thus varying levels of walkability in three communities in New Hampshire were surveyed about their levels of social capital and travel behaviors. Comparisons between the more walkable and less walkable neighborhoods show that levels of social capital are higher in more walkable neighborhoods.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 213
页数:12
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Coleman J(1988)Social capital in the creation of human capital American Journal of Sociology 94 S95-S120
  • [2] Emery M(2006)Spiraling-up: mapping community transformation with community capitals framework Community Development: Journal of the Community Development Society. Vol 37 19-35
  • [3] Flora C(1997)Public infrastructure in economic development and growth: evidence from rural manufacturers Journal of the Community Development Society 28 149-169
  • [4] Halstead JM(2003)Residential relocation and changes in urban travel: does neighborhood-scale urban form matter? JAPA 69 265-281
  • [5] Deller SC(2003)Social capital and the built environment: the importance of Walkable neighborhoods American Journal of Public Health 93 1546-1551
  • [6] Krizek K(2003)Testing the claims of new urbanism: local access, pedestrian travel, and neighboring behaviors Journal of the American Planning Association 69 414-429
  • [7] Leyden K(2006)What is the strength of the link between objective and subjective indicators of urban quality of life? Applied Research in Quality of Life 1 79-96
  • [8] Lund H(2006)Introducing the Official Journal of the International Society for Quality of Life Studies: Applied Research in Quality of Life (ARQOL) Applied Research in Quality of Life 1 1-3
  • [9] McCrea R(2003)Social capital, satisfaction, and quality of life in the workplace Social Indicators Research 61 331-360
  • [10] Shyy T(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined