Influence of Low-Level Anionic Surfactant on PES Ultrafiltration Performance: Membrane Fouling and Rejection of Nuclides

被引:0
作者
Xue Zhang
Lixia Niu
Suping Yu
Fuzhi Li
Xuan Zhao
Hongying Hu
机构
[1] Tsinghua University,Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology
[2] Tsinghua University,State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Microorganism Application and Risk Control (MARC), Graduate School at Shenzhen
[3] Tsinghua University,Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control State Key Joint Laboratory, School of Environment
来源
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution | 2016年 / 227卷
关键词
SDBS; Ultrafiltration; Fouling; Nuclide rejection; Scaling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Surfactants always play a special role in wastewater processes due to their amphiphilic properties. The performance of ultrafiltration was investigated for the treatment of wastewater containing low-level anionic surfactant and trace-level nuclides. Results showed that sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) below the critical micelle concentration (CMC) caused significant effects on membrane fouling and rejection of nuclides. The membrane flux decreased at SDBS concentrations below the CMC but increased at the concentrations near the CMC. The phenomenon was caused by two distinct effects of SDBS, pore blocking by the monomers and enhancement of nuclide scaling caused a decrease in flux, while hydrophilic modification of the membrane surface by micelles caused an increase in flux. The nuclides alone had no significant effect on membrane fouling, but the flux decreased upon an increase in nuclide concentration when coexisting with SDBS. After the addition of low-level SDBS, the rejections of nuclides increased sharply from 20–30 to 60–98 %. The rejections of Sr(II) and Co(II) were higher than those of Ag(I) and Cs(I) due to stronger complexation of SDBS with divalent cations compared with monovalent cations. Deposition of nuclides increased with the addition of SDBS and with increasing of nuclide concentration, resulting in more radioactive solid waste production and more frequent replacement of membrane module.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]  
Aoudia M(2003)Dynamic micellar enhanced ultrafiltration: use of anionic (SDS)-nonionic (NPE) system to remove Cr Journal of Membrane Science 217 181-192
[2]  
Allal N(2012) at low surfactant concentration Water Air and Soil Pollution 223 5039-5048
[3]  
Djennet A(2014)Biodegradation of the anionic surfactant linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) by autochthonous Journal of Membrane Science 458 111-119
[4]  
Toumi L(2007) sp Chemphyschem 8 1836-1845
[5]  
Asok AK(2014)Removal of fluorinated surfactants by reverse osmosis—role of surfactants in membrane fouling Nuclear Engineering and Design 278 249-254
[6]  
Jisha MS(2016)Surfactant fouling of nanofiltration membranes: measurements and mechanisms Desalination 377 47-53
[7]  
Baudequin C(1998)Treatment of low level radioactive wastewater by means of NF process Desalination 118 167-174
[8]  
Mai Z(2000)Influence of surfactant fouling on rejection of trace nuclides and boron by reverse osmosis Chemical Engeering 107 51-54
[9]  
Rakib M(2011)Effect of humic substances and anionic surfactants on the surface charge and performance of reverse osmosis membranes Water Research 45 4522-4530
[10]  
Deguerry I(2005)Scoring with surfactants Journal of Membrane Science 246 1-6