Information and energy policy preferences: a survey experiment on public opinion about electricity pricing reform in rural India

被引:0
作者
Michaël Aklin
Patrick Bayer
S. P. Harish
Johannes Urpelainen
机构
[1] New York University,Department of Politics
[2] University of Pittsburgh,Department of Political Science
[3] Washington University in St. Louis,Department of Political Science, Program in International & Area Studies
[4] Columbia University,Department of Politics
来源
Economics of Governance | 2014年 / 15卷
关键词
Electricity; Power sector; Survey experiment; Investment; India; Rural development; O13; Q48; Q58;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A common argument for the lack of economic reform in developing countries is popular opposition. If current economic policies are dysfunctional, could information about alternatives sway the voters? We examine if a simple argument emphasizing the need to increase electricity prices for improved supply can change public opinion in the case of India’s power sector reforms. The evidence comes from a survey experiment in rural Uttar Pradesh, which is both India’s largest state and has one of the lowest levels of household electrification. As expected, people respond to information about the relationship between electricity pricing, capacity investment, and reliability of supply by increasing their support for higher prices. However, no corresponding increase is observed for privatization of electricity generation. For external validity, we analyze an existing national survey on electricity privatization conducted in 2004/2005, finding patterns that support our argument.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 327
页数:22
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Aklin M(2013)Debating clean energy: frames, counter frames, and audiences Glob Environ Change 23 1225-1232
[2]  
Urpelainen J(2013)Understanding environmental policy preferences: new evidence from Brazil Ecol Econ 96 28-36
[3]  
Aklin M(2001)Global electric power reform, privatization, and liberalization of the electric power industry in developing countries Annu Rev Energy Environ 26 331-359
[4]  
Bayer P(2003)Why is trade reform so popular in Latin America? A consumption-based theory of trade policy preferences World Polit 55 423-455
[5]  
Harish SP(2010)Are survey experiments externally valid? Am Polit Sci Rev 104 226-242
[6]  
Urpelainen J(2007)The power sector in India: an inquiry into the efficacy of the reform process India Policy Forum 4 211-283
[7]  
Bacon RW(2006)Cost of unserved power in Karnataka, India Energy Policy 34 1434-1447
[8]  
Besant-Jones J(2005)Productive uses of energy for rural development Annu Rev Environ Resour 30 117-144
[9]  
Baker A(1998)When does it take a Nixon to go to China? Am Econ Rev 88 180-197
[10]  
Barabas J(2012)Everyone hates privatization, but why? Survey evidence from 28 post-communist countries J Comp Econ 40 44-61