The neural bases of cognitive emotion regulation: The roles of strategy and intensity

被引:0
作者
Craig A. Moodie
Gaurav Suri
Dustin S. Goerlitz
Maria A. Mateen
Gal Sheppes
Kateri McRae
Shreya Lakhan-Pal
Ravi Thiruchselvam
James J. Gross
机构
[1] Stanford University,Department of Psychology
[2] San Francisco State University,undefined
[3] University of Colorado Denver,undefined
[4] University College London,undefined
[5] Tel Aviv University,undefined
[6] University of Denver,undefined
[7] University of Minnesota,undefined
[8] Hamilton College,undefined
来源
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience | 2020年 / 20卷
关键词
Emotion regulation; fMRI; Strategy; Cognitive control; Intensity; Activation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When confronted with unwanted negative emotions, individuals use a variety of cognitive strategies for regulating these emotions. The brain mechanisms underlying these emotion regulation strategies have not been fully characterized, and it is not yet clear whether these mechanisms vary as a function of emotion intensity. To address these issues, 30 community participants (17 females, 13 males, Mage = 24.3 years) completed a picture-viewing emotion regulation task with neutral viewing, reacting to negative stimuli, cognitive reappraisal, attentional deployment, and self-distancing conditions. Brain and behavioral data were simultaneously collected in a 3T GE MRI scanner. Findings indicated that prefrontal regions were engaged by all three regulation strategies, but reappraisal showed the least amount of increase in activity as a function of intensity. Overall, these results suggest that there are both brain and behavioral effects of intensity and that intensity is useful for probing strategy-specific effects and the relationships between the strategies. Furthermore, while these three strategies showed significant overlap, there also were specific strategy-intensity interactions, such as frontoparietal control regions being preferentially activated by reappraisal and self-distancing. Conversely, self-referential and attentional regions were preferentially recruited by self-distancing and distraction as intensity increased. Overall, these findings are consistent with the notion that there is a continuum of cognitive emotion regulation along which all three of these strategies lie.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 407
页数:20
相关论文
共 198 条
[1]  
Beauregard M(2001)Neural correlates of conscious self-regulation of emotion The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 21 RC165-2990
[2]  
Lévesque J(2014)Cognitive reappraisal of emotion: A meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies Cerebral Cortex 24 2981-187
[3]  
Bourgouin P(2016)Toward a Personalized Science of Emotion Regulation Social and Personality Psychology Compass 10 171-2588
[4]  
Buhle JT(2017)Neural Predictors of Decisions to Cognitively Control Emotion The Journal of Neuroscience 37 2580-309
[5]  
Silvers JA(2014)Common and differential neural networks of emotion regulation by detachment, reinterpretation, distraction, and expressive suppression: A comparative fMRI investigation NeuroImage 101 298-373
[6]  
Wage TD(2009)Individual Differences in Typical Reappraisal Use Predict Amygdala and Prefrontal Responses Biological Psychiatry 65 367-7905
[7]  
Lopez R(2016)Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 7900-700
[8]  
Onyemekwu C(2015)The neural bases of emotion regulation Nature Reviews Neuroscience 16 693-1002
[9]  
Kober H(2016)Emotion regulation and amygdala-precuneus connectivity: Focusing on attentional deployment Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 16 991-277
[10]  
Weber J(2013)Neural correlates of attentional deployment within unpleasant pictures NeuroImage 70 268-211