Perceptions and beliefs of general practitioners on their role in the cancer screening programmes in the Netherlands: a mixed-methods study

被引:0
|
作者
Bongaerts, Thomas H. G. [1 ,2 ]
Buechner, Frederike L. [1 ,2 ]
Nierkens, Vera [2 ]
Crone, Matty R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guicherit, Onno R. [4 ]
Numans, Mattijs E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Hlth Campus The Hague, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Hlth Promot, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Canc Ctr Leiden The Hague, Haaglanden Med Ctr, The Hague, Netherlands
来源
BMC PRIMARY CARE | 2024年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
Cancer screening; Participation; General practitioner; Primary care; Netherlands; INCREASING UPTAKE; BREAST-CANCER; MORTALITY; EUROPE; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-024-02394-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background In the Netherlands, population-based cancer screening programmes (CSPs) are organized aiming at cervical, breast and colorectal cancer. For a CSP to be effective, high participation rates are essential; however, there is an alarming downward trend, including wide regional variation in screening uptake. General practitioner (GP) involvement can have a stimulating effect on screening participation. Current GP involvement is however, limited, varies between the programmes and has changed over time. Unexplored is what GPs think of their role(s) in the CSPs. The aim of this study was therefore to map the perceptions and beliefs of GPs regarding their current and future role in the Dutch CSPs.Methods A mixed-methods sequential explanatory study was conducted in the Leiden/The Hague area of the Netherlands, between the end of 2021 and 2022. A questionnaire was developed and distributed among 110 GPs. The aggregated results obtained from the questionnaires served as starting points for conducting semi-structured interviews, with purposefully selected GPs. With this sequential approach we aimed to further enhance the understanding of the questionnaire data, and delved into the topics that emerged from the questionnaire responses.Results In total, 46 GPs completed the online questionnaire (response rate 42%). Subsequent five semi-structured comprehensive interviews were conducted. GPs indicated that they frequently encounter the CSP in their daily practice and consider it important. They also emphasised it is important that GPs remain closely involved with the CSPs in the future. Nevertheless, GPs also repeatedly mentioned that they are not eager to take on more logistical/organizational tasks. They are however willing to empower CSPs in a positive manner.Conclusion GPs were generally positive about the CSPs and their current role within these programmes. Nevertheless, several options have been proposed to improve the CSPs, especially to increase screening uptake for populations in a socioeconomically disadvantaged position. Since it is of utmost importance to screen those who are most at risk of developing the screening-specific tumours, efforts should be made to achieve this goal.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Involvement of general practitioners in colorectal cancer voluntary screening campaign: a mixed-methods study
    Dimova, Rositsa
    Stoyanova, Rumyana
    Tarnovska, Miglena
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2018, 23 (04): : 941 - 949
  • [2] General practitioners' perceptions of their role in cancer follow-up care: A qualitative study in the Netherlands
    Geelen, Els
    Krumeich, Anja
    Schellevis, Francois G.
    van den Akker, Marjan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2014, 20 (01) : 17 - 24
  • [3] Developing a competency model for Chinese general practitioners: a mixed-methods study
    Gong, Xue
    Zhang, Xu
    Zhang, Xinyan
    Li, Yixuan
    Zhang, Yang
    Yu, Xiaosong
    HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [4] Primary prevention in general practice - views of German general practitioners: a mixed-methods study
    Holmberg, Christine
    Sarganas, Giselle
    Mittring, Nadine
    Braun, Vittoria
    Dini, Lorena
    Heintze, Christoph
    Rieckmann, Nina
    Muckelbauer, Rebecca
    Mueller-Nordhorn, Jacqueline
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2014, 15
  • [5] Primary prevention in general practice – views of German general practitioners: a mixed-methods study
    Christine Holmberg
    Giselle Sarganas
    Nadine Mittring
    Vittoria Braun
    Lorena Dini
    Christoph Heintze
    Nina Rieckmann
    Rebecca Muckelbauer
    Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn
    BMC Family Practice, 15
  • [6] PUBLIC BELIEFS AND RISK PERCEPTIONS OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN HONG KONG: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY
    Liao, Qiuyan
    Yuan, Jiehu
    Lam, Wendy Wing Tak
    Lee, Tsz-cheung
    Yang, Lin
    Fielding, Richard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2023, 30 : S43 - S43
  • [7] Depression Screening Perceptions and Practices in a Primary Care Clinic: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Pilipenko, Nataliya
    Vivar-Ramon, Christian
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2023, 20 (04) : 756 - 763
  • [8] Palliative care Needs Rounds in rural residential aged care: A mixed-methods study exploring experiences and perceptions of staff and general practitioners
    Rainsford, Suzanne
    Johnston, Nikki
    Liu, Wai-Man
    Glasgow, Nicholas
    Forbat, Liz
    PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 28 (05) : 308 - 317
  • [9] Equity and practice issues in colorectal cancer screening Mixed-methods study
    Buchman, Sandy
    Rozmovits, Linda
    Glazier, Richard H.
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2016, 62 (04) : E186 - E193
  • [10] General practitioners and emergency departments (GPED)-efficient models of care: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Morton, Katherine
    Voss, Sarah
    Adamson, Joy
    Baxter, Helen
    Bloor, Karen
    Brandling, Janet
    Cowlishaw, Sean
    Doran, Tim
    Gibson, Andrew
    Gutacker, Nils
    Liu, Dan
    Purdy, Sarah
    Roy, Paul
    Salisbury, Christopher
    Scantlebury, Arabella
    Vaittinen, Anu
    Watson, Rose
    Benger, Jonathan Richard
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (10):