Exploring Potential Implementation Barriers and Facilitators of the SMART Program: A Stepped-Care Package of eHealth HIV Prevention Interventions for Adolescent Men Who Have Sex with Men

被引:0
作者
Ana Ventuneac
Dennis H. Li
Melissa C. Mongrella
David A. Moskowitz
Kenneth R. Weingardt
C. Hendricks Brown
Jeffrey T. Parsons
Brian Mustanski
机构
[1] Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,Division of Infectious Diseases
[2] Northwestern University,Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine
[3] Northwestern University,Institute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing
[4] Pear Therapeutics,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine
[5] Northwestern University,Center for Prevention Implementation Methodology for Drug Abuse and HIV
[6] Northwestern University,Department of Psychology
[7] Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York (CUNY),undefined
来源
Sexuality Research and Social Policy | 2020年 / 17卷
关键词
eHealth programs; Implementation science; HIV prevention; Adolescent men who have sex with men; Community-based organizations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Little is known about how to best implement eHealth HIV interventions for adolescent men who have sex with men (AMSM) in real-world settings. In response, our current study describes formative implementation research with community-based organizations (CBOs) in preparation for future implementation of the SMART Program, a stepped-care package of three interventions adapted for AMSM. In-depth interviews focusing on eHealth implementation were conducted with a convenience sample of 12 stakeholders from nine CBOs that actively implemented sexual minority-focused HIV/AIDS prevention programs. Qualitative analysis was conducted using Dedoose to identify salient themes. Most programs implemented at the CBOs engaged adult MSM for HIV prevention, but CBOs reported less experience with outreach of AMSM for HIV prevention. While comfortable with and skilled at implementing traditional in-person HIV prevention programs, interviewees reported that eHealth programs fell outside of their organizations’ technical capacities. They suggested specific strategies to facilitate successful implementation of SMART and other eHealth programs, including technical-capacity-building at CBOs, better training of staff, and partnering with a national coordinating center that provides support for the technology. Overall, the CBOs reported enthusiasm for the SMART Program and thought it was an efficient way to bridge their current gaps in online programming and lack of AMSM HIV prevention strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 388
页数:10
相关论文
共 132 条
[1]  
Bailey J(2015)Sexual health promotion for young people delivered via digital media: A scoping review Public Health Research 3 1-120
[2]  
Mann S(2009)The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: Actualizing their potential Annual Review of Public Health 30 273-292
[3]  
Wayal S(2013)A computational future for preventing HIV in minority communities: How advanced technology can improve implementation of effective programs Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 63 S72-S84
[4]  
Hunter R(2012)Vital signs: HIV infection, testing, and risk behaviors among youths—United States Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 61 971-976
[5]  
Free C(2002)Factors affecting the delivery of HIV/AIDS prevention programs by community-based organizations AIDS Education and Prevention 14 27-37
[6]  
Abraham C(2012)Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: Combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact Medical Care 50 217-226
[7]  
Murray E(2009)Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science Implementation Science 4 50-1327
[8]  
Bennett GG(2014)Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of eHealth interventions in somatic diseases: A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses Journal of Medical Internet Research 16 1322-127
[9]  
Glasgow RE(1999)Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework American Journal of Public Health 89 119-S31
[10]  
Brown CH(2001)The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: What can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Education and Counseling 44 S26-543