Preschool children’s beliefs about the acceptability of relational and physical aggression

被引:0
作者
Swit C.S. [1 ]
McMaugh A. [1 ]
Warburton W.A. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Education, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, NSW
[2] Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, 2109, NSW
关键词
Early childhood; Physical aggression; Preschool; Relational aggression; Social cognition; Social information processing;
D O I
10.1007/s13158-016-0155-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This research examined differences in beliefs about the acceptability of aggression and behavioral responses to aggression of preschool-aged children. Two groups, identified from teacher ratings, participated in the research. One group of children exhibited relationally aggressive behaviors, and a comparison group was identified with non-aggressive behaviors. Children’s social skills were assessed through observations. Beliefs about the acceptability of aggression and behavioral responses to aggression were assessed using four vignettes presented with toy figures. Children were encouraged to use the figurines to verbalize or enact responses. Children’s responses were analyzed and could be categorized as problem-solving or aggressive responses. There were no significant differences between groups on beliefs about the acceptability of aggression. However, younger children held more accepting beliefs about aggression. The methodological technique identified that relationally aggressive children used more problem-solving and conflict resolution strategies compared to children in the comparison group. These findings have important implications for educators in recognizing that not all forms of aggression are associated with fewer prosocial problem-solving skills. Methodological techniques employed in this study are recommended for use in the delivery of intervention programs aimed at reducing aggressive behaviors of preschool children. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 127
页数:16
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Anderson C.A., Bushman B.J., Human aggression, Annual Review of Psychology, 53, pp. 27-51, (2002)
  • [2] Atlas R.S., Pepler D.J., Observations of bullying in the classroom, Journal of Educational Research, 92, pp. 86-97, (1998)
  • [3] Averdijk M., Malti T., Ribeaud D., Eisner M., Trajectories of aggressive behavior and children's social-cognitive development, International Journal of Developmental Science, 5, pp. 103-111, (2011)
  • [4] Bellmore A.D., Witkow M.R., Graham S., Juvonen J., From beliefs to behavior: The mediating role of hostile response selection in predicting aggression, Aggressive Behavior, 31, pp. 1-20, (2005)
  • [5] Boxer P., Tisak M., Goldstein S., Is it bad to be good? An exploration of aggressive and prosocial behavior subtypes in Adolescence, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, pp. 91-100, (2004)
  • [6] Cillessen A., Mayeux L., From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status, Child Development, 75, pp. 147-163, (2004)
  • [7] Cohen J., A power primer, Psychological Bulletin, 112, pp. 155-159, (1992)
  • [8] Cote S., Vaillancourt T., Barker E., Nagin N., Tremblay R., The joint development of physical and indirect aggression: Predictors of continuity and change during childhood, Developmental Psychopathology, 19, pp. 37-53, (2007)
  • [9] Crick N.R., Casas J., Mosher M., Relational and overt aggression in preschool, Developmental Psychology, 33, pp. 579-588, (1997)
  • [10] Crick N.R., Dodge K.A., A review and reformulation of social information processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment, Psychological Bulletin, 115, pp. 74-101, (1994)