The Impact of Perceived Threat of Infectious Disease on the Framing Effect

被引:3
作者
Sevi B. [1 ,2 ]
Eskenazi T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, PO Box 6040, Morgantown, 26506-6040, WV
[2] Department of Psychology, Koç University, Istanbul
关键词
Behavioral immune system; Decision-making; Framing effect; Perceived vulnerability to disease;
D O I
10.1007/s40806-018-0145-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The framing effect is a heuristic bias, where the way a question is presented affects people’s response to it. This study (n = 924) investigated the influence of the behavioral immune system on the framing effect. We tested the changes in people’s responses towards two frames (i.e., losses and gains) when presented with a threat of disease and as a function of their perceived vulnerability to disease (PVD) level. After being randomly assigned to one of three priming conditions—disease threat, negative threat, and no-threat—participants were presented with one of the two-frame versions (gain or loss) of the damaged painting problem where they chose between a safe and a risky option. Finally, participants responded to the PVD scale and to demographic questions. Results revealed that when people were primed with disease threat, those with lower PVD had a higher likelihood to take risks in the gain frame and a lower likelihood in the loss frame. This effect was not observed when participants were primed with negative threat or no-threat, nor for those participants with high levels of PVD. This finding suggests a specific effect of disease threat on the framing effect. © 2018, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 346
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Ackerman J.M., Becker D.V., Mortensen C.R., Sasaki T., Neuberg S.L., Kenrick D.T., A pox on the mind: disjunction of attention and memory in the processing of physical disfigurement, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 3, pp. 478-485, (2009)
[2]  
Ackerman J.M., Tybur J.M., Mortensen C.R., Infectious disease and imperfections of self-image, Psychological Science, (2017)
[3]  
Best R., Charness N., Age differences in the effect of framing on risky choice: a meta-analysis, Psychology and Aging, 30, pp. 688-698, (2015)
[4]  
Brown M., Rodriguez D.N., Gretak A.P., Berry M.A., Preliminary evidence for how the behavioral immune system predicts juror decision-making, Evolutionary Psychological Science, pp. 1-10, (2017)
[5]  
Cassotti M., Habib M., Poirel N., Aite A., Houde O., Moutier S., Positive emotional context eliminates the framing effect in decision-making, Emotion, 12, 5, (2012)
[6]  
Cesario J., Plaks J.E., Hagiwara N., Navarrete C.D., Higgins E.T., The ecology of automaticity: how situational contingencies shape action semantics and social behavior, Psychological Science, 21, 9, pp. 1311-1317, (2010)
[7]  
Chen M.K., Lakshminarayanan V., Santos L.R., How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior, Journal of Political Economy, 114, 3, pp. 517-537, (2006)
[8]  
Clay R., The behavioral immune system and attitudes about vaccines: contamination aversion predicts more negative vaccine attitudes, Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 2, pp. 162-172, (2017)
[9]  
Duncan L.A., Schaller M., Park J.H., Perceived vulnerability to disease: development and validation of a 15-item self-report instrument, Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 6, pp. 541-546, (2009)
[10]  
Faulkner J., Schaller M., Park J.H., Duncan L.A., Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 4, pp. 333-353, (2004)