The 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock—An Update on the Guidelines for Initial Therapy

被引:0
作者
Jeffrey P. Green
Jason Adams
Edward A. Panacek
Timothy A. Albertson
机构
[1] UC Davis Health System,Department of Emergency Medicine
[2] UC Davis Health System,Department of Internal Medicine
[3] Veterans Administration Northern California Health Care System,undefined
关键词
Sepsis; Severe sepsis; Septic shock; Surviving Sepsis Campaign; Guideline; Diagnosis;
D O I
10.1007/s40138-013-0019-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines, clinicians have access to evidence based guidelines for the treatment of adults with severe sepsis. Some of the important changes include: new recommendations for screening of adults with sepsis for organ dysfunction (grade 1C); lactate normalization as a therapeutic target in early resuscitation (grade 2C); colloids no longer recommended for initial resuscitation (grade 1B); a minimum of 30 mL/kg for initial fluid resuscitation (grade 1C); norepinephrine as the initial vasopressor of choice (dopamine allowed only under specific circumstances) (grade 1B); removal of recombinant human activated protein C for the treatment of severe sepsis (ungraded); removal of permissive hypercapnea as a recommendation (ungraded); and a change of the target blood glucose level to <180 mg/dL (previously 150 mg/dL) (grade 1A). In this article, we review the evidence base for these and other guideline changes for the early treatment of severe sepsis in adults.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 171
页数:17
相关论文
共 491 条
  • [1] Lagu T(2012)Hospitalizations, costs, and outcomes of severe sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007 Crit Care Med 40 754-761
  • [2] Rothberg MB(2001)Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care Crit Care Med 29 1303-1310
  • [3] Shieh MS(2008)Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008 Crit Care Med 36 296-327
  • [4] Pekow PS(2008)GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations BMJ 336 924-926
  • [5] Steingrub JS(2008)What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 336 995-998
  • [6] Lindenauer PK(2006)Surviving sepsis–practice guidelines, marketing campaigns, and Eli Lilly N Engl J Med 355 1640-1642
  • [7] Angus DC(2006)Translating research to clinical practice: a 1-year experience with implementing early goal-directed therapy for septic shock in the emergency department Chest 129 225-232
  • [8] Linde-Zwirble WT(2008)The effect of a quantitative resuscitation strategy on mortality in patients with sepsis: a meta-analysis Crit Care Med 36 2734-2739
  • [9] Lidicker J(2007)Prospective external validation of the clinical effectiveness of an emergency department-based early goal-directed therapy protocol for severe sepsis and septic shock Chest 132 425-432
  • [10] Clermont G(2006)Implementation of an evidence-based “standard operating procedure” and outcome in septic shock Crit Care Med 34 943-949