Betting on the future: how to build antifragility in innovative start-up companies

被引：0
作者：
Vincenzo Corvello
Alberto Michele Felicetti
Ciro Troise
Mario Tani
机构：
[1] University of Messina,Department of Engineering
[2] University of Calabria,Department of Mechanical Energy and Management Engineering
[3] University of Turin,Department of Management
[4] University Federico II,Department of Economics, Management and Institutions
来源：
Review of Managerial Science | 2024年 / 18卷
关键词：
Innovative startup companies; Antifragility; Resilience; Intellectual capital; Absorptive capacity; Innovation; M13; O34;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
While after a crisis, organizational robustness and resilience are associated with the return to pre-shock conditions, antifragility is characterized by the tendency to take advantage of the shock to improve the organization’s position. Understanding how to create antifragility is important to ensure rapid recovery from a crisis. This is especially true for innovative start-ups, which if they are particularly fragile also have the opportunity to improve their unstable situation by adapting to the new context. However, studies on the subject are rare. To fill this gap, a survey was carried out with 181 Italian innovative start-ups to investigate the relationship between antifragility and intangible resources, tangible surplus resources, and absorptive capacity. The results show that antifragility is supported by a combination of tangible and intangible resources that can help innovative start-ups thrive when other organizations succumb.
引用
收藏
页码：1101 / 1127
页数：26
相关论文
共 335 条
  • [11] Agostini L(2011)Resilience: the concept, a literature review and future directions Int J Prod Res 49 5375-5393
  • [12] Nosella A(1998)Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that develops measures and models Manag Decis 36 63-76
  • [13] Filippini R(2018)How entrepreneurial resilience generates resilient SMEs Int J Entrep Behav Res 24 1244-1263
  • [14] Aspelund A(2021)Innovation, environmental sustainability and economic development: DEA-Bootstrap and multilevel analysis to compare two regions Technol Forecast Soc Change 172 121040-508
  • [15] Berg-Utby T(2022)Innovation and borrower discouragement in SMEs Small Bus Econ 40 483-395
  • [16] Skjevdal R(2014)Human capital pipelines: competitive implications of repeated interorganizational hiring J Manag 37 376-17
  • [17] Barney JB(2012)Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital Acad Manag Rev 29 1-2051
  • [18] Bendickson J(2021)Innovativeness in Brazilian start-ups: the effect of the absorptive capacity and environmental dynamism Int J Innov Learn 57 2032-781
  • [19] Muldoon J(2019)Innovating through digital revolution” Manag Decis 4 765-107
  • [20] Ligouri E(2001)From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 19 89-479
12345678910