Embracing Bitcoin: users’ perceived security and trust

被引:0
|
作者
Ooi S.K. [1 ]
Ooi C.A. [2 ]
Yeap J.A.L. [3 ]
Goh T.H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Graduate School of Business, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, 11800, Penang
[2] School of Economics, Finance and Banking, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Changlun, 06010, Kedah
[3] School of Management, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, 11800, Penang
[4] Keysight Technologies Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., Bayan Lepas, Penang
关键词
Bitcoin; Cryptocurrency; Malaysia; Perceived security; Perceived trust;
D O I
10.1007/s11135-020-01055-w
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Of late, disruptive innovation in financial services is driving the tremendous growth of cryptocurrency, with Bitcoin being the most popular virtual currency of interest among investors. Notwithstanding the volatility of the cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin preserves a core group of committed users. Despite concerns over security threats of digital transactions, little is known about Bitcoin users’ perceived security and trust in the Bitcoin system. As such, this paper aims to examine the underlying security features that lead to users’ perceived security and trust, and the role of perceived security and trust in explaining Bitcoin use. Structural equation modelling was used to analyse self-report questionnaires from 109 Bitcoin users. Technical protections, transaction procedures and security statements are the determinants of perceived security and trust towards Bitcoin. Nonetheless, findings of the importance-performance map analysis (IPMA) indicated that perceived security, perceived trust and technical protections are the areas of focus for increasing Bitcoin use. This paper offers several fruitful implications which could ultimately lead to the discussion on sustainability of cryptocurrency in financial markets. © 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1219 / 1237
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The determinants of trust and perceived risk on bitcoin users
    Lopez-Zambrano, Carlos Roberto
    Camberos-Castro, Mario
    Villarreal-Peralta, Edna Maria
    RETOS-REVISTA DE CIENCIAS DE LA ADMINISTRACION Y ECONOMIA, 2021, 11 (22): : 199 - 215
  • [2] Bitcoin adoption: Scams and anonymity may not matter but trust into Bitcoin security does
    Murko, Aleksander
    Vrhovec, Simon L. R.
    THIRD CENTRAL EUROPEAN CYBERSECURITY CONFERENCE (CECC 2019), 2019,
  • [3] E-Payment Continuance Usage: The Roles of Perceived Trust and Perceived Security
    Nguyen, Thanh D.
    Tran, Quynh N. T.
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS - ICCSA 2022 WORKSHOPS, PART V, 2022, 13381 : 253 - 264
  • [4] User perception of Bitcoin usability and security across novice users
    Alshamsi, Abdulla
    Andras, Peter
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2019, 126 : 94 - 110
  • [5] Security and privacy of mobile wallet users in Bitcoin, Dash, Monero, and Zcash
    Biryukov, Alex
    Tikhomirov, Sergei
    PERVASIVE AND MOBILE COMPUTING, 2019, 59
  • [6] Bitcoin and Blockchain: Security and Privacy
    Zaghloul, Ehab
    Li, Tongtong
    Mutka, Matt W.
    Ren, Jian
    IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2020, 7 (10) : 10288 - 10313
  • [7] Investigating the Role of Perceived Risk, Perceived Security and Perceived Trust on Smart m-Banking Application Using SEM
    Almaiah, Mohammed Amin
    Al-Otaibi, Shaha
    Shishakly, Rima
    Hassan, Lamia
    Lutfi, Abdalwali
    Alrawad, Mahmoad
    Qatawneh, Mohammad
    Abu Alghanam, Orieb
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [8] Understanding the creation of trust in cryptocurrencies: the case of Bitcoin
    Marella, Venkata
    Upreti, Bikesh
    Merikivi, Jani
    Tuunainen, Virpi Kristiina
    ELECTRONIC MARKETS, 2020, 30 (02) : 259 - 271
  • [9] Understanding the creation of trust in cryptocurrencies: the case of Bitcoin
    Venkata Marella
    Bikesh Upreti
    Jani Merikivi
    Virpi Kristiina Tuunainen
    Electronic Markets, 2020, 30 : 259 - 271
  • [10] Impact of Perceived Security on Trust, Perceived Risk, and Acceptance of Online Banking in Iran
    Damghanian, Hossein
    Zarei, Azim
    Kojuri, Mohammad Ali Siahsarani
    JOURNAL OF INTERNET COMMERCE, 2016, 15 (03) : 214 - 238