Micromorphology and adhesive performance of Er:YAG laser-treated dentin of primary teeth

被引:0
作者
Simon Flury
Tamara Koch
Anne Peutzfeldt
Adrian Lussi
机构
[1] University of Bern,Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine
来源
Lasers in Medical Science | 2012年 / 27卷
关键词
Erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet; Scanning electron microscopy (SEM); Microtensile bond strength;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study evaluated (1) the micromorphology by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and (2) the adhesive performance by microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of diamond bur-treated dentin compared to Er:YAG laser-treated dentin of human primary teeth. (1) For qualitative SEM evaluation, dentin of 18 second primary molars (n = 3/method) was treated with either diamond bur as a control (group 1a: 40 μm diamond bur only (clinical situation); group 1b: grinding + 40 μm diamond bur) or with Er:YAG laser (group 2a (clinical situation, manufacturer’s settings): 200 mJ/25 Hz (5 W) + 100 mJ/35 Hz (3.5 W) laser only; group 2b (experimental setting "high"): grinding + 400 mJ/20 Hz (8 W); group 2c (manufacturer’s setting "finishing"): grinding + 100 mJ/35 Hz (3.5 W); group 2d (experimental setting "low"): grinding + 50 mJ/35 Hz (1.75 W)). (2) For evaluation of adhesive performance, 64 second primary molars were divided into four groups and treated as described for group 1b and groups 2b/c/d (n = 16/method), and μTBS of Clearfil SE/Clearfil Majesty Esthetic to dentin was measured. The SEM micrographs were qualitatively analyzed. The μTBS values were compared with a Kruskal–Wallis test. The significance level was set at α = 0.05. SEM micrographs showed the typical micromorphologies with a smear layer for the diamond bur groups and open dentin tubules for all laser-treated groups. However, in group 2d, the laser beam had insufficiently irradiated the dentin area, rendering the underlying ground surface partly visible. There were no statistically significant differences between μTBS values of the four groups (p = 0.394). This suggests that Er:YAG laser treatment of dentin of primary molars provides bond strengths similar to those obtained following diamond bur treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 535
页数:6
相关论文
共 144 条
  • [1] Keller U(1997)Effects of Er:YAG laser in caries treatment: a clinical pilot study Lasers Surg Med 20 32-38
  • [2] Hibst R(2004)Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an erbium:YAG laser Am J Dent 17 331-336
  • [3] Trajtenberg CP(2008)Adhesion to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin after long-term water storage and thermocycling Oper Dent 33 51-58
  • [4] Pereira PN(1998)Erbium:YAG laser application in caries therapy. Evaluation of patient perception and acceptance. J Dent 26 649-656
  • [5] Powers JM(1999)Scanning electron microscopic analysis of diseased and healthy dental hard tissues after Er:YAG laser irradiation: in vitro study J Endod 25 543-546
  • [6] Amaral FL(2007)The use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation: an SEM evaluation Microsc Res Tech 70 803-808
  • [7] Colucci V(2008)Influence of dentin cavity surface finishing on micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives Dent Mater 24 492-501
  • [8] de Souza-Gabriel AE(2008)Influence of Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment on the microtensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin J Adhes Dent 10 25-33
  • [9] Chinelatti MA(2004)Morpho-structural aspects of Er:YAG-prepared class V cavities J Clin Laser Med Surg 22 119-123
  • [10] Palma-Dibb RG(2006)Indications and limitations of Er:YAG laser applications in dentistry Am J Dent 19 178-186