Preliminary Study to Test the Feasibility of Sex Identification of Human (Homo sapiens) Bones Based on Differences in Elemental Profiles Determined by Handheld X-ray Fluorescence

被引:0
作者
Korakot Nganvongpanit
Kittisak Buddhachat
Janine L. Brown
Sarisa Klinhom
Tanita Pitakarnnop
Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh
机构
[1] Chiang Mai University,Animal Bone and Joint Research Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
[2] Chiang Mai University,Excellence Center in Osteology Research and Training Center
[3] Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute,Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine
[4] Center for Species Survival,undefined
[5] Chiang Mai University,undefined
来源
Biological Trace Element Research | 2016年 / 173卷
关键词
Bone; Discrimination; Human; Mineral; Sex estimation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sex assignment of human remains is a crucial step in forensic anthropological studies. The aim of this study was to examine elemental differences between male and female bones using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and determine if elemental profiling could be used for sex discrimination. Cranium, humerus, and os coxae of 60 skeletons (30 male, 30 female) from the Chiang Mai University Skeletal Collection were scanned by XRF and differences in elemental profiles between male and female bones determined using discriminant analysis. In the cranium, three elements (S, Ca, Pb) were significantly higher in males and five elements (Si, Mn, Fe, Zn, Ag) plus light elements (atomic number lower than 12) were higher in females. In humerus and os coxae, nine elements were significantly higher in male and one element was higher in female samples. The accuracy rate for sex estimation was 60, 63, and 61 % for cranium, humerus, and os coxae, respectively, and 67 % when data for all three bones were combined. We conclude that there are sex differences in bone elemental profiles; however, the accuracy of XRF analyses for discriminating between male and female samples was low compared to standard morphometric and molecular methods. XRF could be used on small samples that cannot be sexed by traditional morphological methods, but more work is needed to increase the power of this technique for gender assignment.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 29
页数:8
相关论文
共 168 条
[1]  
Spradley MK(2011)Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements J Forensic Sci 56 289-96
[2]  
Jantz RL(2013)Discriminant functions for sex estimation of modern Japanese skulls J Forensic Leg Med 20 234-8
[3]  
Ogawa Y(2014)Morphometric analysis of pelvic sexual dimorphism in a contemporary Western Australian population Int J Legal Med 128 861-72
[4]  
Imaizumi K(2013)A method for estimating sex using the clavicle, humerus, radius, and ulna J Forensic Sci 58 1413-9
[5]  
Miyasaka S(2014)Sex estimation from the talus in a Thai population Forensic Sci Int 240 e1-8
[6]  
Yoshino M(2015)Evaluating sexual dimorphism in the human mastoid process: a viewpoint on the methodology Clin Anat 28 593-601
[7]  
Franklin D(2009)Novel methods of molecular sex identification from skeletal tissue using the amelogenin gene Forensic Sci Int Genet 3 74-9
[8]  
Cardini A(2011)Gender differences in the phosphorus content of the sino-atrial nodes and other cardiac regions of monkeys Biol Trace Elem Res 143 871-81
[9]  
Flavel A(2010)Age-related changes of elements in the anterior commissures and the relationships among their elements Biol Trace Elem Res 135 86-97
[10]  
Marks MK(2015)Preliminary validation of handheld X-ray fluorescence spectrometry: distinguishing osseous and dental tissue from nonbone material of similar chemical composition J Forensic Sci 60 382-90