Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: rise of the Confucian Model

被引:0
作者
Simon Marginson
机构
[1] The University of Melbourne,Centre for the Study of Higher Education, Melbourne Graduate School of Education
来源
Higher Education | 2011年 / 61卷
关键词
Comparative education; Asia–Pacific; China; Confucian tradition; National systems; Role of government; Private funding; Research;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The paper reviews Asia–Pacific higher education and university research, focusing principally on the “Confucian” education nations Japan, Korea, China, Hong Kong China, Taiwan, Singapore and Vietnam. Except for Vietnam, these systems exhibit a special developmental dynamism—still playing out everywhere except Japan—and have created a distinctive model of higher education more effective in some respects than systems in North America, the English-speaking world and Europe where the modern university was incubated. The Confucian Model rests on four interdependent elements: (1) strong nation-state shaping of structures, funding and priorities; (2) a tendency to universal tertiary participation, partly financed by growing levels of household funding of tuition, sustained by a private duty, grounded in Confucian values, to invest in education; (3) “one chance” national examinations that mediate social competition and university hierarchy and focus family commitments to education; (4) accelerated public investment in research and “world-class’ universities. The Model has downsides for social equity in participation, and in the potential for state interference in executive autonomy and academic creativity. But together with economic growth amid low tax regimes, the Confucian Model enables these systems to move forward rapidly and simultaneously in relation to each and all of mass tertiary participation, university quality, and research quantity and quality.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 611
页数:24
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Hazelkorn E(2008)Learning to live with league tables and ranking: The experience of institutional leaders Higher Education Policy 21 193-215
  • [2] Huang F(2006)Incorporation and university governance: A comparative perspective from China and Japan Higher Education Management and Policy 18 35-49
  • [3] Kember D(2009)Opening up the road to nowhere: Problems with the path to mass higher education in Hong Kong Higher Education 59 167-179
  • [4] Kong L(2006)Knowledges of the creative economy. Towards a relational geography of diffusion and adaptation in Asia Asia Pacific Viewpoint 47 173-194
  • [5] Gibson C(2006)Vietnam: The political economy of education in a ‘socialist’ periphery Asia Pacific Journal of Education 26 1-20
  • [6] Khoo L-M(2007)Incorporation of national universities in Japan Asia Pacific Journal of Education 27 291-303
  • [7] Semple A-L(2010)Contemporary trends in East Asian higher education: Dispositions of international students in a Taiwan university Higher Education 59 149-166
  • [8] London J(2009)The ‘brand name’ research university goes global Higher Education 57 125-140
  • [9] Oba J(2010)Tigers burning bright Cover 17 32-33
  • [10] Roberts A(2009)Diversification or homogenization: How governments and markets have combined to (re)shape Chinese higher education in its recent massification process Higher Education 58 41-58