The Importance of Ethical Appraisal in Social Science Research: Reviewing a Faculty of Humanities' Research Ethics Committee

被引:16
|
作者
de Wet K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Centre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, I.B. 39
关键词
Ethical appraisal; Faculty of humanities; Research ethics committee; Social science;
D O I
10.1007/s10805-010-9118-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research Ethics Committees (RECs) or Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are rapidly becoming indispensable mechanisms in the overall workings of university institutions. In fact, the ethical dimension is an important aspect of research governance processes present in institutions of higher learning. However, it is often deemed that research in the social sciences do not require ethical appraisal or clearance, because of the alleged absence of harm in conducting such research. This is an erroneous and dangerous assumption given that research in social sciences poses various and complex dilemmas related to ethics. The article aims to gauge the importance of ethical appraisal at a particular institution of higher learning's Faculty of Humanities. This is done by scrutinising its defunct REC, and the views that Heads of Departments of the Faculty have of ethics in research and the need for ethical appraisal by this REC. Finally, some suggestions are made to proceed to review and restructure the current REC with the ultimate objective to make it functional again. It was found that the development and discussion around ethics in research and ethical appraisal are part of a much needed thrust to sensitise the entire Faculty and the institution on the widespread beneficial repercussions of ethical awareness in research and beyond. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 314
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] SOCIAL-SCIENCE RESEARCH ETHICS
    HOROWITZ, IL
    SCIENCE, 1979, 206 (4422) : 1022 - 1022
  • [22] SOCIAL-SCIENCE - ETHICS OF RESEARCH
    HUMPHREYS, L
    SCIENCE, 1980, 207 (4432) : 712 - &
  • [23] How reliable are faculty at reviewing student exercise science research projects?
    Sherman, NW
    RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 1999, 70 (01) : A63 - A63
  • [24] THE SCIENCE OF REVIEWING RESEARCH
    OXMAN, AD
    GUYATT, GH
    DOING MORE GOOD THAN HARM: THE EVALUATION OF HEALTH CARE INTERVENTIONS, 1993, 703 : 125 - 134
  • [25] EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FACULTY, STUDENTS, AND THE SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL ETHICS REVIEW COMMITTEE THROUGH ACTION RESEARCH
    Griebling, Susan
    Zayas, Vilma Reyes
    Borders, Christy
    Moore, Elizabeth
    Sokol, Ashley
    Brydon-Miller, Mary
    Gerlach, Julie
    Norman, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2009, 4 (02) : 27 - 36
  • [26] Research ethics committee
    Miller, Saul
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2007, 57 (544): : 930 - 930
  • [27] Procedural ethics for social science research: Introducing the Research Ethics Governance dataset
    Tapscott, Rebecca
    Machon, Daniel Rincon
    JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [28] Social Science and Humanities Research in and on Africa: Searching for Alternatives
    Holl, Augustin F. C.
    CONTEMPORANEA-REVISTA DE SOCIOLOGIA DA UFSCAR, 2021, 10 (03): : 1019 - 1044
  • [29] The new genetics: A social science and humanities research agenda
    Machado, N
    Burns, TR
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY-CAHIERS CANADIENS DE SOCIOLOGIE, 2000, 25 (04): : 495 - 506
  • [30] The academic impact of Chinese humanities and social science research
    Zhang Jie
    Su Xinning
    Deng Sanhong
    ASLIB PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 60 (01): : 55 - 74