The race between global economic growth and carbon emissions: based on a comparative study of developed and developing countries

被引:0
作者
Ya Wu
Jing Wan
机构
[1] Jinan University,College of Economics
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2024年 / 31卷
关键词
Carbon emission reduction; Economic growth; Tapio decoupling; LMDI; Decoupling efforts;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, there has been a persistent intensification of the global greenhouse effect. Balancing carbon emission reduction with economic growth poses an unprecedented global challenge. To better comprehend the relationship between economic growth and carbon emissions, this study first utilized the Tapio decoupling index to compare the decoupling relationship (the USA, Japan, and Germany) and three developing countries (China, India, and Russia) from 2000–2020. Additionally, the logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) method was employed to investigate the factors influencing changes in carbon emissions. Our findings indicate that (1) the USA and Germany basically achieved strong decoupling; China, India, and Russia mainly showed weak decoupling; and Japan showed recessive decoupling. (2) Economic growth predominantly contributed to increased carbon emissions, with a lesser impact from population growth. A significant reduction in energy intensity restrained carbon emissions growth, as did energy structure replacement in most countries, excluding Japan. Based on this, a decoupling effort index was formulated. It has shown that the decoupling efforts made by developing countries are weaker than those of developed countries, primarily attributed to a lesser degree of decoupling between energy intensity and structure. This paper offers valuable insights for developing countries undergoing a low-carbon economic transformation. They should counterbalance carbon emission escalation resulting from economic growth through technological and energy structure improvements.
引用
收藏
页码:19226 / 19243
页数:17
相关论文
共 257 条
[1]  
Ang BW(2005)The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide Energy Policy 33 867-871
[2]  
Ang BW(2004)Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? Energy Policy 32 1131-1139
[3]  
Chen J(2018)Decomposition and decoupling analysis of CO Appl Energy 231 937-950
[4]  
Wang P(2021) emissions in OECD Nucl Eng Technol 53 2056-2065
[5]  
Cui L(2020)An empirical investigation of nuclear energy consumption and carbon dioxide (CO Sustain Dev 28 1457-1464
[6]  
Danish OB(2007)) emission in India: bridging IPAT and EKC hypotheses Energy Econ 29 636-664
[7]  
Ulucak R(2021)Relationship between energy intensity and CO J Clean Prod 306 127099-75
[8]  
Danish UR(2019) emissions: does economic policy matter? Resour Conserv Recycl 141 61-691
[9]  
Khan SUD(2007)Decomposition analysis for assessing the progress in decoupling industrial growth from CO Ecol Econ 62 683-63858
[10]  
Diakoulaki D(2022) emissions in the EU manufacturing sector Environ Sci Pollut Res 29 63846-656