Is bimodality a sufficient condition for a first-order phase transition existence?

被引:0
作者
K. A. Bugaev
A. I. Ivanytskyi
V. V. Sagun
D. R. Oliinychenko
机构
[1] National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics
[2] National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,Physical Engineering Training
关键词
Phase Transition; Surface Free Energy; Thermodynamic Limit; Nucleus Letter; Finite System;
D O I
10.1134/S1547477113060058
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Here we present two explicit counterexamples to the widely spread beliefs about an exclusive role of bimodality as the first-order phase transition signal. On the basis of an exactly solvable statistical model generalizing the statistical multifragmentation model of nuclei, we demonstrate that the bimodal distributions can naturally appear both in infinite and in finite systems without a phase transition. In the first counterexample a bimodal distribution appears in an infinite system at the supercritical temperatures due to the negative values of the surface tension coefficient. In the second counterexample we explicitly demonstrate that a bimodal fragment distribution appears in a finite volume analog of a gaseous phase. In contrast to the statistical multifragmentation model, the developed statistical model corresponds to the compressible nuclear liquid with the tricritical endpoint located at one third of the normal nuclear density. The suggested parameterization of the liquid phase equation of state is consistent with the L. Van Hove axioms of statistical mechanics and it does not lead to an appearance of the nonmonotonic isotherms in the macroscopic mixed phase region which are typical for the classical models of the Van der Waals type. Peculiarly, such a way to account for the nuclear liquid compressibility automatically leads to an appearance of an additional state that in many respects resembles the physical antinuclear matter.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 520
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Chomaz Ph(2001)undefined Phys. Rev., Ser. E 64 046114-undefined
[2]  
Gulminelli F(2004)undefined Ann. Phys. Fr. 29 6-undefined
[3]  
Dufiot V(2007)undefined Nucl. Phys., Ser. A 791 165-undefined
[4]  
Gulminelli F(2006)undefined Eur. Phys. J., Ser. A 30 263-undefined
[5]  
Gulminelli F(2006)undefined Nucl. Phys., Ser. A 779 267-undefined
[6]  
Lopez O(2008)undefined Nucl. Phys., Ser. A 807 48-undefined
[7]  
Rivet M F(2009)undefined Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 072701-undefined
[8]  
Pichon M(1952)undefined Phys. Rev. 87 404-undefined
[9]  
Bruno M(2005)undefined Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 242701-undefined
[10]  
Bonnet E(2007)undefined Phys. Part. Nucl. 38 447-undefined