Interactions among macroeconomic policies, the energy market and environmental quality

被引:0
作者
Ivan Hajdukovic
机构
[1] University of Barcelona,School of Economics
来源
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies | 2021年 / 23卷
关键词
Air Pollution; Energy markets; Fiscal policy; Monetary policy; Vector autoregression; C32; E52; E62; E63; Q41; Q43; Q53;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper provides an empirical examination on the interactions among macroeconomic policies, the energy market and environmental quality. The analysis is conducted for two non-EMU countries, Switzerland and the United Kingdom, over the period 1990–2016. We propose two distinct VAR models based on a macroeconomic framework including the energy market. The study evaluates the dynamic effects of shocks to fiscal and monetary policy on the energy market and environmental quality. We identify four policy shocks: (i) government consumption (ii) public investment (iii) the official bank policy rate (iv) the central bank’s reserve assets. The empirical analysis reveals that fiscal and monetary policies have a significant influence on the energy market and environmental quality. Our findings indicate that fiscal policy, besides its primary role in stabilizing economic activity, can contribute to achieving non-renewable energy conservation and enhancing environmental quality. On the other hand, the examination of monetary policy reveals that central banks should investigate the impact of their interventions on the energy market and incorporate environmental issues in their welfare maximization problem.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 913
页数:52
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Apergis N(2010)Renewable energy consumption and growth in Eurasia Energy Economics 32 1392-1397
  • [2] Payne JE(2010)The Impact of Social Factors and Consumer Behavior on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the United Kingdom J Ind Ecol 14 50-72
  • [3] Baiocchi G(2012)Impacts of climatic change on water and associated economic activities in the Swiss Alps J Hydrol 412–413 291-296
  • [4] Minx J(2013)Are bigger governments better providers of public goods? Evidence from air pollution Public Choice 156 593-609
  • [5] Hubacek K(2014)Differences among OECD countries’ GHG emissions: Causes and policy implications Energy Policy 67 895-902
  • [6] Beniston M(2015)Variable selection in the analysis of energy consumption-growth nexus Energy Economics 52 207-216
  • [7] Bernauer T(2005)Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy Journal of Political Economy 113 1-45
  • [8] Koubi V(1991)A critique of the application of unit root tests Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 15 275-284
  • [9] Calbick KS(2003)Determining the trade-environment composition effect: The role of capital, labor and environmental regulations Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46 363-383
  • [10] Gunton T(2018)Climate Change, Financial Stability and Monetary Policy Ecol Econ 152 219-234