Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada

被引:0
作者
Brenda M. Stoesz
Sarah Elaine Eaton
Jennifer Miron
Emma J. Thacker
机构
[1] University of Manitoba,Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning
[2] University of Calgary,Werklund School of Education
[3] Humber College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning,undefined
[4] Durham College,undefined
[5] Keele University,undefined
来源
International Journal for Educational Integrity | / 15卷
关键词
Academic integrity; Canada; College; Contract cheating; Higher education; Policy; Post-secondary;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, we analyzed the academic integrity policies of colleges in Ontario, Canada, casting a specific lens on contract cheating. We extracted data from 28 individual documents from 22-publicly-funded colleges including policies and procedures (n = 27) and code of conduct (n = 1). We analyzed the characteristics of the documents from three perspectives: (a) document type and titles; (b) policy language; and (c) policy principles. Then we examined five core elements of the documentation including (a) access; (b) approach; (c) responsibility; (d) detail; and (e) support. Key findings revealed that specific and direct language pertaining to contract cheating was largely absent from the policy documents, that underlying policy principles lacked clear definition, and that exemplary policy has yet to be developed in this context. We conclude with recommendations for increased policy research in the area of academic integrity and a call for policy revision in Canadian higher education institutions to more explicitly address the issue of contract cheating, as well as provide more support to students and other campus stakeholders to better understand how contract cheating impacts and impedes teaching and learning.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 74 条
[31]  
Eaton SE(2001)An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: A multicampus investigation J Educ Bus 77 69-77
[32]  
Dressler R(2002)Beyond “Gotcha!”: Situating plagiarism in policy and pedagogy Coll Compos Commun 54 88-231
[33]  
Eaton SE(2017)Detecting contract cheating in essay and report submissions: Process, patterns, clues and conversations Int J Educ Integr 13 10-129
[34]  
Edino RI(2007)How do high school students justify internet plagiarism? Ethics Behav 17 215-26
[35]  
Foltýnek T(2017)Contract cheating: Will students pay for serious criminal consequences? Altern Law J 42 123-142
[36]  
Glendinning I(2019)Evaluation of a tutorial designed to promote academic integrity Can Perspect Acad Integr 2 3-undefined
[37]  
Griffith J(2015)Constructing bullying in Ontario, Canada: A critical policy analysis Educ Stud 41 122-undefined
[38]  
Gullifer JM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[39]  
Tyson GA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[40]  
Harper R(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined