Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada

被引:0
作者
Brenda M. Stoesz
Sarah Elaine Eaton
Jennifer Miron
Emma J. Thacker
机构
[1] University of Manitoba,Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning
[2] University of Calgary,Werklund School of Education
[3] Humber College Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning,undefined
[4] Durham College,undefined
[5] Keele University,undefined
来源
International Journal for Educational Integrity | / 15卷
关键词
Academic integrity; Canada; College; Contract cheating; Higher education; Policy; Post-secondary;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, we analyzed the academic integrity policies of colleges in Ontario, Canada, casting a specific lens on contract cheating. We extracted data from 28 individual documents from 22-publicly-funded colleges including policies and procedures (n = 27) and code of conduct (n = 1). We analyzed the characteristics of the documents from three perspectives: (a) document type and titles; (b) policy language; and (c) policy principles. Then we examined five core elements of the documentation including (a) access; (b) approach; (c) responsibility; (d) detail; and (e) support. Key findings revealed that specific and direct language pertaining to contract cheating was largely absent from the policy documents, that underlying policy principles lacked clear definition, and that exemplary policy has yet to be developed in this context. We conclude with recommendations for increased policy research in the area of academic integrity and a call for policy revision in Canadian higher education institutions to more explicitly address the issue of contract cheating, as well as provide more support to students and other campus stakeholders to better understand how contract cheating impacts and impedes teaching and learning.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] Axelrod P(2011)People, processes, and policy-making in Canadian post-secondary education, 1990–2000 High Educ Policy 24 143-166
  • [2] Desai-Trilokekar R(2018)Evidence-based policy and higher education quality assurance: Progress, pitfalls and promise Eur J High Educ 8 272-287
  • [3] Shanahan T(2011)Accounting for cheating: An evolving theory and emergent themes Res High Educ 52 640-658
  • [4] Wellen R(2018)Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university students Stud High Educ 0 1-20
  • [5] Beerkens M(2018)Contract cheating and assessment design: Exploring the relationship Assess Eval High Educ 0 1-16
  • [6] Brent E(2011)Academic integrity standards: A preliminary analysis of the academic integrity policies at Australian universities AuQF 2011 48-53
  • [7] Atkisson C(2011)Core elements of exemplary academic integrity policy in Australian higher education Int J Educ Integr 7 3-12
  • [8] Bretag T(2001)The efficacy of policy statements on plagiarism: Do they change students’ views? Res High Educ 42 103-118
  • [9] Harper R(2010)A ten-step model for academic integrity: A positive approach for business schools J Bus Ethics 92 1-13
  • [10] Burton M(2012)Alleviating the policy paradox through improved institutional policy systems: A case study Innov High Educ 37 11-26