The Expression of Dehydrin Genes and the Intensity of Transpiration in Drought-stressed Maize Plants

被引:0
|
作者
J. Klimešová
L. Holková
T. Středa
机构
[1] Mendel University in Brno,Department of Crop Science, Breeding and Plant Medicine, Faculty of AgriSciences
来源
关键词
drought stress; sap flow; meteorological factors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The stress reaction of maize plants was evaluated in relation to drought stress intensity and to growth stages by assessing the transpiration intensity and the expression of two dehydrin genes, DHN1 and DHN2. The maize plants were grown under four different watering conditions: well-watered (control), mild stress, moderate stress and high stress. The sap flow values were taken as an indicator of plant stress reactions at the transpiration level. A significant correlation between the average diurnal values of sap flow and the volumetric soil moisture appeared only for the moderate stress condition (R = 0.528) and for the high stress condition (R = 0.395). Significant increases in the expression of DHN1 and DHN2 (DHN1 = 105-fold and DHN2 = 103-fold) were observed primarily for the high stress condition compared to the control. Differences in the stress reactions at the DHN1 gene expression level were detected for all the experimental drought stress conditions. A relatively close relationship between the levels of expression of both genes and the values of the sap flow was observed during the initial stage of the stress (R = –0.895; R = –0.893). The severity of water stress and transpiration intensity significantly affected certain biometric and yield parameters of maize. Higher DHN genes expression at the ripening stage was related to lower grain and dry biomass yield. The results indicated that DHN gene expression assessment in maize and evaluation of the changes in transpiration expressed by the sap flow could be considered appropriate indicators of stress intensity while the DHN gene expression assessment appeared to be more sensitive than evaluation of the changes in transpiration, mainly in the initial phases of stress response.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 368
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Expression of Dehydrin Genes and the Intensity of Transpiration in Drought-stressed Maize Plants
    Klimesova, J.
    Holkova, L.
    Streda, T.
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 45 (03) : 355 - 368
  • [2] Water use efficiency in the drought-stressed sorghum and maize in relation to expression of aquaporin genes
    Hasan, S. A.
    Rabei, S. H.
    Nada, R. M.
    Abogadallah, G. M.
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2017, 61 (01) : 127 - 137
  • [3] Proteome Analysis of Drought-Stressed Plants
    Mohammadi, Payam Pour
    Nouri, Mohammad-Zaman
    Komatsu, Setsuko
    CURRENT PROTEOMICS, 2012, 9 (04) : 232 - 244
  • [4] FREE PROLINE ACCUMULATION IN DROUGHT-STRESSED PLANTS
    PATEL, JA
    VORA, AB
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1985, 84 (03) : 427 - 429
  • [5] Dehydrin transcript fluctuations during a day/night cycle in drought-stressed sunflower
    Cellier, F
    Conéjéro, G
    Casse, F
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2000, 51 (343) : 299 - 304
  • [6] STOMATAL-RESISTANCE, TRANSPIRATION, AND GROWTH OF DROUGHT-STRESSED EASTERN COTTONWOOD
    KELLIHER, FM
    KIRKHAM, MB
    TAUER, CG
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1980, 10 (04): : 447 - 451
  • [7] Physiological mechanisms limiting kernel set in drought-stressed maize
    Westgate, M.
    COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY A-MOLECULAR & INTEGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 141 (03): : S308 - S308
  • [8] NONLINEAR RESPONSES OF SPIDER MITES TO DROUGHT-STRESSED HOST PLANTS
    ENGLISHLOEB, GM
    ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1989, 14 (01) : 45 - 55
  • [9] Diterpenes and antioxidative protection in drought-stressed Salvia officinalis plants
    Munné-Bosch, S
    Mueller, M
    Schwarz, K
    Alegre, L
    JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 158 (11) : 1431 - 1437
  • [10] Transcript accumulation of putative drought responsive genes in drought-stressed chickpea seedlings
    Medini, Maher
    Baum, Michael
    Hamza, Sonia
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 8 (18): : 4441 - 4449