Retinotopic effects of visual attention revealed by dichoptic multifocal pupillography

被引:0
作者
Yanti Rosli
Corinne Frances Carle
Yiling Ho
Andrew Charles James
Maria Kolic
Emilie Marie Françoise Rohan
Ted Maddess
机构
[1] Australian National University,Eccles Institute of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research
[2] Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,Biomedical Science Program, Diagnostic & Applied Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Science
[3] University of Melbourne,Centre for Eye Research Australia
来源
Scientific Reports | / 8卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) has recently been shown to be able to measure cortical function. Here we assessed 44 regions of the central 60 degrees of the visual fields of each eye concurrently in 7 minutes/test. We examined how foveally- and peripherally-directed attention changed response sensitivity and delay across the 44 visual field locations/eye. Four experiments were completed comparing white, yellow and blue stimulus arrays. Experiments 1 to 4 tested 16, 23, 9 and 6 subjects, 49/54 being unique. Experiment 1, Experiments 2 and 3, and Experiment 4 used three variants of the mfPOP method that provided increasingly improved signal quality. Experiments 1 to 3 examined centrally directed attention, and Experiment 4 compared effects of attention directed to different peripheral targets. Attention reduced the sensitivity of the peripheral locations in Experiment 1, but only for the white stimuli not yellow. Experiment 2 confirmed that result. Experiment 3 showed that blue stimuli behaved like white. Peripheral attention showed increased sensitivity around the attentional targets. The results are discussed in terms of the cortical inputs to the pupillary system. The results agree with those from multifocal and other fMRI and VEP studies. mfPOP may be a useful adjunct to those methods.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 152 条
  • [1] Cepeda NJ(1998)Spatial selection via feature-driven inhibition of distractor locations Percept Psychophys 60 727-746
  • [2] Cave KR(2000)Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds Percept Psychophys 62 1485-1493
  • [3] Bichot NP(2000)Evidence for suppressive mechanisms in attentional selection: feature singletons produce inhibitory surrounds Percept Psychophys 62 969-983
  • [4] Kim MS(1999)A physiological correlate of the ‘spotlight’ of visual attention Nat Neurosci 2 370-374
  • [5] Mounts JR(1999)Increase activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation Neuron 22 751-761
  • [6] Mounts JR(2000)Attention suppression of activity in the human visual cortex Neuroreport 11 271-277
  • [7] Brefczynski J(2009)Exploring BOLD changes during spation attention in non-stimulated visual cortex PLoS ONE 4 1-8
  • [8] DeYoe E(2006)Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 1053-1058
  • [9] Kastner S(2008)Behavioral correlates of negative BOLD signal changes in the primary somatosensory cortex Neuroimage 41 1364-1371
  • [10] Pinsk M(2010)Ignoring the elephant in the room: a neural circuit to downregulate salience J Neurosci 30 6072-6079