Arsenic Removal from Contaminated Water Using the CaO–SiO2–FeO Glassy Phase in Steelmaking Slag

被引:1
作者
Hiroki Yoshida
Xu Gao
Shohei Koizumi
Sun-joong Kim
Shigeru Ueda
Takahiro Miki
Shin-ya Kitamura
机构
[1] Tohoku University,Graduate School of Engineering
[2] NSK,Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials
[3] Tohoku University,Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering
[4] Chosun University,Metallurgical Process Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering
[5] Tohoku University,undefined
来源
Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy | 2017年 / 3卷
关键词
Arsenic removal; Steelmaking slag; Glassy-phase; Adsorption; FeOOH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Arsenic is a highly toxic element, and its removal is crucially important. To remove As from water, Fe-based materials have shown high As removal capacities. From the perspective of low removal cost, steelmaking slag is a potential material because it is rich in iron oxides. However, due to insufficient dissolution of Fe in water, the potential effects of iron oxides in As removal from steelmaking slag have not been completely revealed. In this study, a CaO–SiO2–FeO glassy phase, which allows Fe to be easily dissolved in water, was used to remove As from solution. With pH lower limit of 4 and the addition of an oxidizer (KMnO4), a high As removal ratio was obtained with a final As content of lower than 0.1 mg/L. The removal mechanism was found to be the adsorption of As on the precipitated FeOOH. When using the glassy phase to remove As, control of pH and oxidation/reduction potential was necessary to dissolve Fe and Ca, and to form FeOOH as the adsorbent. In addition, because the Si dissolved from glassy phase could have a polymerization effect that improves the permeability and stability of FeOOH, the As removal rate increased in the presence of Si. The adsorption kinetics was found to obey a pseudo-second-order model, and chemisorption was the rate-controlling step. The adsorption capacity estimated from the Langmuir isotherm was about 28.17 mg/g-glassy phase, which was much higher than the values previously reported while using steelmaking slag.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 485
页数:15
相关论文
共 114 条
  • [1] Smedley PL(2002)A review of the source, behavior and distribution of arsenic in natural waters Appl Geochem 17 517-568
  • [2] Kinniburgh DG(2002)Arsenic round the world: a review Talanta 58 201-235
  • [3] Mandal BK(2002)Worldwide occurrences of arsenic in ground water Science 296 2143-2145
  • [4] Suzuki KT(2007)Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—a acritical review J Hazard Mater 142 1-53
  • [5] Nordstrom DK(2011)Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review J Environ Manag 92 407-418
  • [6] Mohan D(2006)Occurrence of arsenic contamination in Canada, 3127 sources, behavior and distribution Sci Total Environ 366 701-721
  • [7] Pittman CU(1982)Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate on amorphous iron hydroxide Water Res 16 1247-1253
  • [8] Fu F(2003)Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility Environ Sci Technol 37 4182-4189
  • [9] Wang Q(1998)Arsenite and arsenate adsorption on ferrihydrite: kinetics equilibrium, and adsorption envelopes Environ Sci Technol 32 344-349
  • [10] Wang S(2005)Methyl arsenic adsorption and desorption behavior on iron oxides Environ Sci Technol 39 2120-2127