Experimente unter dem Milgram-Paradigma

被引:0
作者
Lüttke H.B. [1 ]
机构
[1] 47226 Duisburg
来源
Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) | 2004年 / 35卷 / 4期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s11612-004-0040-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper discusses the origins of Stanley Milgram's experiments and presents an overview of the results of all experiments which were either carried out by Milgram himself or in replications done in accordance with Milgram's paradigm between 1960 and 1985. After determining the general obedience rate of destructive commands, the impact of the following situational factors on behavior is examined: a) the proximity of the victim, b) the institutional and the personal power of the authority exercising an influence, c) the influence of groups in the framework of which the test subjects act and/or of behavioral models with which he or she are confronted. It is demonstrated that a) the victim's proximity represents the strongest determinant of behavior, b) the power of the institutional authority has hardly any influence and that the power of the personal authority has only little, c) pressure to conform that is exerted by groups or behavioral models co-determines behavior under authoritative influence independently of the pressure type. Finally, an assessment is made analyzing whether personal factors can be identified distinguishing obedient from disobedient persons. It is shown that the experiments do not give any indication showing that factors such as sex or age have a significant influence on obedience.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 464
页数:33
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Ancona L., Pareyson R., Contribute allo studio della aggressione: La dinamica della obedienza distruttiva, Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psychiatria, 29, pp. 340-372, (1968)
[2]  
Baumrind D., Some thoughts on ethics of research: After reading Milgram's "Behavioral Study of Obedience, American Psychologist, 19, pp. 421-423, (1964)
[3]  
Miller A.G., The Social Psychology of Psychological Research, pp. 106-111, (1972)
[4]  
Baumrind D., Principles of ethical conduct in the treatment of subject, American Psychologist, 26, pp. 887-896, (1971)
[5]  
Baumrind D., Research using intentional deception: Ethical issues revisited, American Psychologist, 40, pp. 165-174, (1985)
[6]  
Blasi A., Autonomie im Gehorsam - Die Entwicklung des Distanzierungsvermögens im sozialisierten Handeln, Soziale Interaktion und Soziales Verstehen - Beiträge zur Entwicklung der Interaktionskompetenz, pp. 300-347, (1984)
[7]  
Blass T., The social psychology of Stanley Milgram, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, pp. 277-329, (1992)
[8]  
Blass T., The roots of Stanley Milgram's obedience experiments and their relevance to the Holocaust, Analyse & Kritik, 20, pp. 46-53, (1998)
[9]  
Blass T., Obedience to authority, Current Perspectives on the Milgram Paradigm, (1999)
[10]  
Blass T., The Milgram paradigm after 35 Years: Some things we know about obedience to authority, Obedience to Authority. Current Perspectives on the Milgram Paradigm, pp. 365-460, (1999)