Smart machine fault diagnostics based on fault specified discrete wavelet transform

被引:0
作者
Oguzhan Das
Duygu Bagci Das
机构
[1] National Defence University,Department of Aeronautics, Air NCO Higher Vocational School
[2] Ege University,Department of Computer Programming
来源
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering | 2023年 / 45卷
关键词
Smart fault diagnosis; Rotating machine; Wavelet transform; Artificial intelligence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study examines the impact of the mother wavelet, sensor selection, and machine learning (ML) models for smart fault diagnosis of rotating machines via discrete wavelet transform (DWT). The ability of Daubechies, Haar, Biorthogonal (Bior), Symlets (Sym), and Coiflets (Coif) wavelets is measured in terms of distinguishing imbalance, horizontal/vertical misalignment, and overhang/underhang bearing ball, cage, and outer race faults. For this purpose, single-step and two-step fault monitoring (SSFM and TSFM) approaches are proposed. In SSFM, the ML models detect the fault type by the healthy and faulty signals. In TSFM, the built models first determined whether the machine is faulty or not. If it is, then the models detect the fault type. As ML models, Random Forest (RF), AdaBoost with C4.5 (AB-C4.5), and two artificial neural network algorithms are trained by the features of DWT. Besides, the effect of the sensor type on the fault diagnosis is measured by considering the tachometer, microphone, and two accelerometers individually and combined. The results are interpreted regarding the evaluation metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, confusion matrix, and model built time. It is concluded that Bior3.1 and Haar wavelets distinguish the fault type more accurately than other wavelets. Besides, the RF-Bior3.1 give the best results for SSFM and TSFM by accuracy values of 99.80% and 99.98%, respectively. It is also found that the sensor type is correlated with the selected mother wavelet.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 317 条
[1]  
Selcuk S(2017)Predictive maintenance, its implementation and latest trends Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 231 1670-1679
[2]  
Stenström C(2016)Preventive and corrective maintenance-cost comparison and cost-benefit analysis Struct Infrastruct Eng 12 603-617
[3]  
Norrbin P(2007)Risk-based maintenance-techniques and applications J Hazard Mater 142 653-661
[4]  
Parida A(2012)An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application Comput Ind Eng 63 135-149
[5]  
Kumar U(2006)A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance Mech Syst Sig Process 20 1483-1510
[6]  
Arunraj NS(2020)Predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review Comput Ind Eng 150 106889-526
[7]  
Maiti J(2019)The quality management ecosystem for predictive maintenance in the industry 4.0 era Int J Qual Innov 5 4-387
[8]  
Ahmad R(2019)Maintenance in aeronautics in an industry 4.0 context: the role of augmented reality and additive manufacturing J Comput Des Eng 6 516-1302
[9]  
Kamaruddin S(2017)Intelligent predictive maintenance for fault diagnosis and prognosis in machine centers: industry 4.0 scenario Adv Manuf 5 377-908
[10]  
Jardine AKS(2017)Supporting remote maintenance in industry 4.0 through augmented reality Procedia Manuf 11 1296-2615