Recent advances in robotic surgery for rectal cancer

被引:0
作者
Soichiro Ishihara
Kensuke Otani
Koji Yasuda
Takeshi Nishikawa
Junichiro Tanaka
Toshiaki Tanaka
Tomomichi Kiyomatsu
Keisuke Hata
Kazushige Kawai
Hiroaki Nozawa
Shinsuke Kazama
Hironori Yamaguchi
Eiji Sunami
Joji Kitayama
Toshiaki Watanabe
机构
[1] The University of Tokyo Hospital,Department of Surgical Oncology
来源
International Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015年 / 20卷
关键词
Rectal cancer; Robotic surgery; Laparoscopic surgery;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Robotic technology, which has recently been introduced to the field of surgery, is expected to be useful, particularly in treating rectal cancer where precise manipulation is necessary in the confined pelvic cavity. Robotic surgery overcomes the technical drawbacks inherent to laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer through the use of multi-articulated flexible tools, three-dimensional stable camera platforms, tremor filtering and motion scaling functions, and greater ergonomic and intuitive device manipulation. Assessments of the feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for rectal cancer have reported similar operation times, blood loss during surgery, rates of postoperative morbidity, and circumferential resection margin involvement when compared with laparoscopic surgery. Furthermore, rates of conversion to open surgery are reportedly lower with increased urinary and male sexual functions in the early postoperative period compared with laparoscopic surgery, demonstrating the technical advantages of robotic surgery for rectal cancer. However, long-term outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery for rectal cancer have not been fully evaluated yet; therefore, large-scale clinical studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of this new technology.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 640
页数:7
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]  
Heald RJ(1982)The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69 613-616
[2]  
Husband EM(2009)Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial Lancet Oncol 10 44-52
[3]  
Ryall RD(2013)Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer Br J Surg 100 75-82
[4]  
Buunen M(2005)Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial Lancet 365 1718-1726
[5]  
Veldkamp R(2007)Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group J Clin Oncol 25 3061-3068
[6]  
Hop WC(2008)The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer Ann Surg 248 1-7
[7]  
Green BL(2012)An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer Int J Colorectal Dis 27 233-241
[8]  
Marshall HC(2010)Optimal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the role of robotic surgery from an expert’s view J Korean Soc Coloproctol 26 377-387
[9]  
Collinson F(2012)Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy Eur Urol 62 1-15
[10]  
Guillou PJ(2011)Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study Dis Colon Rectum 54 151-156