High-Tech Foragers? Folsom and Later Paleoindian Technology on the Great Plains

被引:0
作者
Douglas B. Bamforth
机构
[1] University of Colorado,Anthropology Department
来源
Journal of World Prehistory | 2002年 / 16卷
关键词
Paleoindian; Folsom; lithic technology; Great Plains; mobility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Archaeologists generally argue that early (ca. 11,000–8000 B.P. populations on the North American Great Plains moved over very large areas, relying on sophisticated, biface-based flaked stone technology and on extensive resharpening and recycling of tools to cope with unpredictable access to raw material sources. This paper reviews the development of this reconstruction and considers the degree to which data from assemblages of Paleoindian flaked stone tools support it. Published information implies that patterns of raw material use vary greatly over the Plains, that bifaces were not the centerpiece of Paleoindian technology, that there are no published efforts to document an unusual degree of resharpening or recycling, and that the data that are available on these topics do not suggest that either was important. Detailed analysis of one assemblage, from the Allen site in southwestern Nebraska, carried out with these issues in mind, shows similar patterns. The great difference between what the literature says about Paleoindian technology and the documented character of that technology suggests that Paleoindian lifeways were far more variable than current discussions suggest.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 98
页数:43
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Amick D.(1995)Patterns of technological variation among Folsom and Midland projectile points in the American Southwest Plains Anthropologist 40 23-38
[2]  
Bamforth D. B.(1985)The technological organization of Paleoindian small-group bison hunting on the Llano Estacado Plains Anthropologist 30 243-258
[3]  
Bamforth D. B.(1991)Flintknapping skill, communal hunting, and Paleoindian projectile point typology Plains Anthropologist 36 309-322
[4]  
Bamforth D.B.(1991)Technological organization and hunter/gatherer mobility:ACalifornia example American Antiquity 56 216-234
[5]  
Bamforth D. B.(2000)Core/biface ratios, mobility, refitting, and artifact use-lives: A Paleoindian example Plains Anthropologist 45 273-290
[6]  
Becker M.(2001)Regional variability in Clovis, Folsom, and Cody land use Plains Anthropologist 46 65-94
[7]  
Blackmar J.(1991)Folsom mobility and organization of technology:Aview from Blackwater Draw, New Mexico Plains Anthropologist 36 281-296
[8]  
Boldurian A.(1994)Preforms in Folsom lithic technology Plains Anthropologist 39 445-464
[9]  
Boldurian A.(1979)The basics of biface manufacture in the Eastern Fluted Point Tradition Archaeology of Eastern North America 7 1-180
[10]  
Hubinsky S.(1991)On the validity of Middle Paleolithic tool types: A test case from the eastern Sahara Journal of Field Archaeology 18 256-264