Effect of different forms of capital on the adoption of multiple climate-smart agriculture strategies by smallholder farmers in Assam, India

被引:0
作者
Jigyasa Sandilya
Kishor Goswami
机构
[1] Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur,Department of Humanities and Social Sciences
来源
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change | 2024年 / 29卷
关键词
Climate-smart agriculture (CSA); Adoption; Smallholder farmers; Mixed method; Multivariate probit;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Agricultural production is affected by the threats of climate change, such as changes in the frequency of extreme events (such as flood and drought), changes in rainfall patterns, and increased pest attacks and diseases. As a result, the farmers face huge socio-economic losses in the form of loss of lives, loss of cultivable lands, loss in crop yield, and loss to infrastructure. The smallholder farmers who primarily depend on rainfed agriculture for a living bear major crop losses and threats to food security due to climate change. In order to enable the farmers to cope with the challenges associated with climate change, climate-smart agricultural (CSA) practices were introduced. It must be noted that CSA practices depend on economic, environmental, and social attributes; hence, location-specific studies are required to identify the determinants of CSA adoption. The present study aims to identify the factors influencing smallholder farmers’ adoption of CSA strategies in the highly vulnerable Nagaon district of India. Our study has incorporated six forms of capital: physical capital, social capital, human capital, financial capital, natural capital, and institutional capital in its analytical framework. The influence of these capitals is examined on the farmers’ adoption decision. We use a mixed-method approach to conduct the analysis. A multivariate probit model is used for the quantitative analysis, and excerpts from focus group discussions are presented as qualitative information gathered from field surveys. Three unique variables are included in the present study: the use of agricultural applications by smallholder farmers, the application of indigenous technical knowledge, and access to government-provided seeds. Each of the three variables was found to be statistically significant. Further, the study found the variables under social capital, physical capital, and institutional capital to be critical determinants affecting CSA adoption by smallholder farmers.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
Abegunde VO(2019)Determinants of the adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices by small-scale farming households in King Cetshwayo District Municipality, South Africa Sustainability 12 195-1241
[2]  
Sibanda M(2020)A scoping review of adoption of climate-resilient crops by small-scale producers in low-and middle-income countries Nat Plants 6 1231-13
[3]  
Obi A(2023)Farm structure and environmental context drive farmers’ decisions on the spatial distribution of ecological focus areas in Germany Landscape Ecol 38 1-427
[4]  
Acevedo M(2018)Adoption of multiple climate-smart agricultural practices in the Gangetic plains of Bihar, India Int J Clim Change Strateg Manag 10 407-174
[5]  
Pixley K(2019)Exploring the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: a cross regional study of EU farmers Land Use Policy 80 163-15549
[6]  
Zinyengere N(2021)Perceptions and adaptation behavior of farmers to climate change in the upper Brahmaputra Valley, India Environ Dev Sustain 23 15529-189
[7]  
Meng S(2019)Can differences in individual learning explain patterns of technology adoption? Evidence on heterogeneous learning patterns and hybrid rice adoption in Bihar, India World Dev 115 178-1088
[8]  
Alarcón-Segura V(2018)Impact of climate-smart agriculture adoption on the food security of coastal farmers in Bangladesh Food Secur 10 1073-33
[9]  
Roilo S(2022)Do rice varieties matter? Climate change adaptation and livelihood diversification among rural smallholder households in the Mekong Delta region of Vietnam Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 27 1-99
[10]  
Paulus A(2020)Human capital and adoption of innovations: policy implications Appl Econ Perspect Policy 42 92-72