Multidisciplinary design optimization of vehicle instrument panel based on multi-objective genetic algorithm

被引:0
作者
Ping Wang
Guangqiang Wu
机构
[1] Tongji University,Automotive School
[2] the University of Tokyo,Institute of Industrial Science
来源
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering | 2013年 / 26卷
关键词
instrument panel(IP); NVH; safety; multidisciplinary design optimization; multi-objective optimization;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Typical multidisciplinary design optimization(MDO) has gradually been proposed to balance performances of lightweight, noise, vibration and harshness(NVH) and safety for instrument panel(IP) structure in the automotive development. Nevertheless, plastic constitutive relation of Polypropylene(PP) under different strain rates, has not been taken into consideration in current reliability-based and collaborative IP MDO design. In this paper, based on tensile test under different strain rates, the constitutive relation of Polypropylene material is studied. Impact simulation tests for head and knee bolster are carried out to meet the regulation of FMVSS 201 and FMVSS 208, respectively. NVH analysis is performed to obtain mainly the natural frequencies and corresponding mode shapes, while the crashworthiness analysis is employed to examine the crash behavior of IP structure. With the consideration of lightweight, NVH, head and knee bolster impact performance, design of experiment(DOE), response surface model(RSM), and collaborative optimization(CO) are applied to realize the determined and reliability-based optimizations, respectively. Furthermore, based on multi-objective genetic algorithm(MOGA), the optimal Pareto sets are completed to solve the multi-objective optimization(MOO) problem. The proposed research ensures the smoothness of Pareto set, enhances the ability of engineers to make a comprehensive decision about multi-objectives and choose the optimal design, and improves the quality and efficiency of MDO.
引用
收藏
页码:304 / 312
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Lam K P(2003)A material and gauge thickness sensitivity analysis on the NVH and crashworthiness of automotive instrument panel support[J] Thin-walled Structures 41 1 005-1 018
[2]  
Behdinan K(2007)Collaborative optimization of complex systems: a multidisciplinary approach[J] Int. J. Interact Des. Manuf. 1 209-218
[3]  
Cleghorn W L(2004)Approximation methods in multidisciplinary analysis and optimization: a panel discussion[J] Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 27 302-313
[4]  
Sebastien R(2005)A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization[J] Computers & Structures 83 2 121-2 136
[5]  
Philippe D(2007)Lightweight design of automotive front side rail based on robust optimization[J] Thin-walled Structures 45 670-676
[6]  
Fouad Bennis(2004)A new response surface methodology for reliability-based design optimization[J] Computers & Structures 82 241-256
[7]  
Simpson T W(2007)Full frontal impact virtual proving ground and body energy analysis[J] Vehicle System Dynamics 45 939-951
[8]  
Booker A J(2005)On polynomial response surfaces and Kriging for use in structural optimization of crashworthiness[J] Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 29 232-243
[9]  
Ghosh D(2004)Multidisciplinary design optimization of a vehicle system in a scalable, high performance computing environment[J] Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 2 256-263
[10]  
Fang H(2005)Reliability-based robust design of vehicle components with non-normal distribution parameters[J] Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 41 102-108