Extended trochanteric osteotomy: current concepts review

被引:21
作者
Sambandam S.N. [1 ]
Duraisamy G. [1 ]
Chandrasekharan J. [1 ]
Mounasamy V. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedics, K.G. Hospital and Postgraduate Medical Institute, Arts College Road, Coimbatore, 641018, Tamil Nadu
[2] VCU Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center, 417 North 11th Street, Richmond, VA
关键词
Hip stability; Revision hip arthroplasty; Trochanteric osteotomy;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-016-1749-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Revision total hip arthroplasty is a technically demanding procedure which has gained importance for more than two decades. It was a nightmare for revision surgeons during its initial years of inception before the advent of extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO). This technique gains access to the femoral medullary canal without compromising the bone stock and aids removal of primary implant and cement mantle without further damaging the parent bone. Like any other surgery, ETO does have certain limitations and complications as reported by various authors. Though it has been routinely used by revision surgeons, thorough knowledge of technical details of ETO is still lacking. So this review article is aimed at addressing the indications, surgical procedure, fixation technique, implant selection and complication of ETO which has been presented over a period of years by various authors. Methods: We searched in the most commonly used portals like MEDLINE (PubMed) and Google scholar using appropriate terminologies for the literature regarding the various preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative clinical scenarios in which revision surgeons utilized ETO. Results and conclusion: ETO is an important tool in the revision surgeon’s armamentarium and can be used in variety of clinical scenarios and for various intraoperative needs and goals. Awareness about biomechanics of ETO, indications, implants selection, fixation techniques and complications is paramount for good intraoperative and postoperative outcome. ETO by posterior approach continues to be a work horse approach for most revision surgeons all over the world. © 2016, Springer-Verlag France.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 245
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Younger T.I., Bradford M.S., Magnus R.E., Paprosky W.G., Extended proximal femoral osteotomy. A new technique for femoral revision arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 10, 3, pp. 329-338, (1995)
  • [2] Chen W.M., McAuley J.P., Engh C.A., Hopper R.H., Engh C.A., Extended slide trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 82, 9, pp. 1215-1219, (2000)
  • [3] Miner T.M.M.N., Chong D., Paprosky W.L., The extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a critical review of 166 cases at mean 3-year, 9-month follow-up, J Arthroplasty, Dec, pp. 188-194, (2001)
  • [4] Mardones R., Gonzalez C., Cabanela M.E., Trousdale R.T., Berry D.J., Extended femoral osteotomy for revision of hip arthroplasty: results and complications, J Arthroplasty, 20, 1, pp. 79-83, (2005)
  • [5] Lakstein D., Kosashvili Y., Backstein D., Safir O., Lee P., Gross A.E., The long modified extended sliding trochanteric osteotomy, Int Orthop, 35, 1, pp. 13-17, (2011)
  • [6] Kuruvalli R.R., Landsmeer R., Debnath U.K., Suresh S.P., Thomas T.L., A new technique to reattach an extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision THA using suture cord, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466, 6, pp. 1444-1448, (2008)
  • [7] Ting N.T., Wera G.D., Levine B.R., Della Valle C.J., Early experience with a novel nonmetallic cable in reconstructive hip surgery, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, 9, pp. 2382-2386, (2010)
  • [8] Huffman G.R., Ries M.D., Combined vertical and horizontal cable fixation of an extended trochanteric osteotomy site, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85-A, 2, pp. 273-277, (2003)
  • [9] Amstutz H.C., Maki S., Complications of trochanteric osteotomy in total hip replacement, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 60, 2, pp. 214-216, (1978)
  • [10] Ritter M.A., Gioe T.J., Stringer E.A., Functional significance of nonunion of the greater trochanter. Clin Orthop 177–182, PMID, 64, (1981)