Why geoengineering is a public good, even if it is bad

被引：0

作者：

David R. Morrow

机构：

[1] University of Alabama at Birmingham,Department of Philosophy

来源：

Climatic Change | 2014年 / 123卷

关键词：

Public Good; Public Choice; Aerosol Optical Depth; Private Good; Common Pool Resource;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Stephen Gardiner argues that geoengineering does not meet the “canonical technical definition” of a global public good, and that it is misleading to frame geoengineering as a public good. A public good is something that is nonrival and nonexcludable. Contrary to Gardiner’s claims, geoengineering meets both of these criteria. Framing geoengineering as a public good is useful because it allows commentators to draw on the existing economic, philosophical, and social scientific literature on the governance of public goods.

引用

页码：95 / 100

页数：5

共 16 条

[1]

Barret S(2008)The incredible economics of geoengineering Environ Resource Econ 39 45-54

[2]

Bodansky D(2012)What’s in a concept? Global public goods, international law, and legitimacy Eur J Int Law 23 651-668

[3]

Gardiner SM(2013)Why geoengineering is not a ‘global public good’, and why it is ethically misleading to frame it as one Clim Chang. 8 01 4021 (8 pp)-389

[4]

Rayner S(2013)The Oxford principles Clim Chang 36 387-180

[5]

Redgwell C(2013)Strategic incentives for climate geoengineering coalitions to exclude broad participation Environ Res Lett 25 157-undefined

[6]

Savulescu J(1954)The pure theory of public expenditure Rev Econ Stat undefined undefined-undefined

[7]

Pidgeon N(2011)Sulfate aerosol geoengineering: the question of justice Public Aff Q undefined undefined-undefined

[8]

Kruger T(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

[9]

Ricke KL(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

[10]

Moreno-Cruz JB(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

← 1 2 →