Engaging citizens living in vulnerable circumstances in research: a narrative review using a systematic search

被引：3
作者：
Goedhart N.S. [1 ,2 ]
Pittens C.A.C.M. [1 ]
Tončinić S. [1 ]
Zuiderent-Jerak T. [1 ]
Dedding C. [2 ]
Broerse J.E.W. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Athena Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam
[2] Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam
来源：
Research Involvement and Engagement | / 7卷 / 1期
关键词：
Citizens living in vulnerable circumstances; Health inequalities; Methods; Narrative review; Patient engagement; Public engagement; Socioecological model; Socioeconomic inequalities;
D O I：
10.1186/s40900-021-00306-w
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Although public engagement in research is increasingly popular, the involvement of citizens living in vulnerable circumstances is rarely realized. This narrative review aims to describe and critically analyse concerns and corresponding strategies, tools, and methods that could support the inclusion of these citizens in health research. The 40 studies that are included were thematically analysed using the socioecological model. Concerns originate most often on the intrapersonal level of the socioecological model, but concerns were also identified at institutional, community, and policy levels. It is thought-provoking that there is a lack of attention for the research and policy structure in which engagement practices are designed, implemented and evaluated. More research is needed to explore how these cultures could be changed in a way that promotes rather than restrains the engagement of citizens living in vulnerable circumstances in research and policymaking. © 2021, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Abma T.A., Broerse J.E.W., Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas, Health Expect, 13, 2, pp. 160-173, (2010)
[2]  
Alcazar L., Raber M., Lopez K., Markham C., Sharma S., Examining the impact of a school-based fruit and vegetable co-op in the Hispanic community through documentary photography, Appetite, 116, 1, pp. 115-122, (2017)
[3]  
Alzubaidi H., Marriott J.L., Patient involvement in social pharmacy research: methodological insights from a project with Arabic-speaking immigrants, Res Soc Adm Pharm, 10, pp. 924-925, (2014)
[4]  
Alzubaidi H., Mc Namara K., Browning C., Time to question diabetes self-management support for Arabic-speaking migrants: exploring a new model of care, Diabet Med, 34, 3, pp. 348-355, (2017)
[5]  
Anderson G.L., Can participatory action research (PAR) democratize research, knowledge, and schooling? Experiences from the global South and North, Int J Qual Stud Educ, 30, 5, pp. 427-431, (2017)
[6]  
Belone L., Lucero J.E., Duran B., Tafoya G., Baker E.A., Chan D., Chang C., Greene-Moton E., Kelley M.A., Wallerstein N., Community-based participatory research conceptual model: community partner consultation and face validity, Qual Health Res, 26, 1, pp. 117-135, (2016)
[7]  
Benjamin-Thomas T.E., Laliberte Rudman D., Cameron D., Batorowicz B., Participatory digital methodologies: potential of three approaches for advancing transformative occupation-based research with children and youth, J Occup Sci, 26, 4, pp. 559-574, (2019)
[8]  
Bethell J., Commisso E., Rostad H.M., Puts M., Babineau J., Grinbergs-Saull A., Wighton M.B., Hammel J., Doyle E., Nadeau S., McGilton K.S., Patient engagement in research related to dementia: a scoping review, Dementia, 17, 8, pp. 944-975, (2018)
[9]  
Bigby C., Anderson S., Cameron N., Identifying conceptualizations and theories of change embedded in interventions to facilitate community participation for people with intellectual disability: a scoping review, J Appl Res Intellect Disabil, 31, 2, pp. 165-180, (2018)
[10]  
Boell S.K., Cecez-Kecmanovic D., A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches, Commun Assoc Inf Syst, 34, 1, pp. 257-286, (2014)
123456789