Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in the Setting of Structural Heart Disease

被引:0
作者
B. P. Betensky
F. E. Marchlinski
机构
[1] Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania,Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiac Electrophysiology Section
来源
Current Cardiology Reports | 2016年 / 18卷
关键词
Ventricular tachycardia; Ischemic cardiomyopathy; Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy; Catheter ablation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sustained ventricular tachycardias are common in the setting of structural heart disease, either due to prior myocardial infarction or a variety of non-ischemic etiologies, including idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Over the past two decades, percutaneous catheter ablation has evolved dramatically and has become an effective tool for the control of ventricular arrhythmias. Single and multicenter observational studies as well as several prospective randomized trials have begun to investigate long-term outcomes after catheter ablation procedures. These studies encompass a wide range of mapping and ablation techniques, including conventional activation mapping/entrainment criteria, substrate modification guided by pacemapping, late potential and abnormal electrogram ablation, scar de-channeling, and core isolation. While large-scale, multicenter prospective randomized clinical trials are somewhat limited, the published data demonstrate favorable outcomes with respect to a reduction in overall ventricular tachycardia (VT) burden, reduction of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks, and discontinuation of anti-arrhythmic medications across varying disease subtypes and convincingly support the use of catheter ablation as the standard of care for many patients with VT in the setting of structural heart disease.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 339 条
[1]  
Aliot EM(2009)EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: developed in a partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a Registered Branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS); in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) Heart Rhythm 6 886-933
[2]  
Stevenson WG(1991)Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial N Engl J Med 324 781-8
[3]  
Almendral-Garrote JM(1997)A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators N Engl J Med 337 1576-83
[4]  
Bogun F(2000)Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS): a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone Circulation 101 1297-302
[5]  
Calkins CH(2000)Randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest: the Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg (CASH) Circulation 102 748-54
[6]  
Delacretaz E(1999)A randomized study of the prevention of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease. Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigators N Engl J Med 341 1882-90
[7]  
Echt DS(2002)Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction N Engl J Med 346 877-83
[8]  
Liebson PR(2005)Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure N Engl J Med 352 225-37
[9]  
Mitchell LB(1980)Comparison of standard aneurysmectomy and aneurysmectomy with directed endocardial resection for the treatment of recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 80 527-34
[10]  
Peters RW(1985)Subendocardial resection for sustained ventricular tachycardia in the early period after acute myocardial infarction Am J Cardiol 55 980-4