Critical pedagogical designs for SETS knowledge co-production: online peer- and problem-based learning by and for early career green infrastructure experts

被引:6
作者
Mathieu Feagan
Megan Fork
Geneva Gray
Maike Hamann
Jason K. Hawes
Elizabeth H. T. Hiroyasu
Brooke Wilkerson
机构
[1] University of Waterloo,Department of Knowledge Integration, Faculty of Environment
[2] West Chester University,Department of Biology
[3] Earth,Department of Marine
[4] and Atmospheric Sciences,Centre for Sustainability Transitions
[5] North Carolina State University,School for Environment and Sustainability
[6] Stellenbosch University,Department of Geography, System Dynamics Group
[7] University of Michigan,Department of Geography, Centre for Climate and Energy Transformation
[8] The Nature Conservancy,undefined
[9] California,undefined
[10] University of Bergen,undefined
[11] University of Bergen,undefined
来源
Urban Transformations | / 5卷 / 1期
关键词
Co-production; Critical pedagogy; Green infrastructure; Capacity building; Social-ecological-technological systems; Transformation; Online collaboration; Early career;
D O I
10.1186/s42854-023-00051-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite a growing understanding of the importance of knowledge co-production for just and sustainable urban transformations, early career green infrastructure experts typically lack opportunities to practice transdisciplinary knowledge co-production approaches within their normal training and professional development. However, using online collaboration technologies combined with peer- and problem-based learning can help address this gap by putting early career green infrastructure experts in charge of organizing their own knowledge co-production activities. Using the case study of an online symposia series focused on social-ecological-technological systems approaches to holistic green infrastructure implementation, we discuss how critical pedagogical designs help create favorable conditions for transdisciplinary knowledge co-production. Our work suggests that the early career position offers a unique standpoint from which to better understand the limitations of current institutional structures of expertise, with a view towards their transformation through collective action.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Barrows HS(1996)Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview New Dir Teach Learn 1996 3-12
[2]  
Chambers JM(2021)Six modes of co-production for sustainability Nat Sustain 4 983-996
[3]  
Wyborn C(2019)Ethical Evaluation and Action Research: Toward New North-South Research Collaborations? Can J Bioeth 1 34-36
[4]  
Ryan ME(2020)Making room and moving over: knowledge co-production, Indigenous knowledge sovereignty and the politics of global environmental change decision-making Curr Opin Environ Sustain 42 7-14
[5]  
Feagan M(2018)Interdependent Infrastructure as Linked Social, Ecological, and Technological Systems (SETSs) to Address Lock-in and Enhance Resilience Earths Future 6 1638-1659
[6]  
Latulippe N(2017)How Cities Think: Knowledge Co-Production for Urban Sustainability and Resilience Forests 8 203-51
[7]  
Klenk N(2017)Beyond critique: the value of co-production in realising just cities? Local Environ 22 36-130
[8]  
Markolf SA(2016)Conceptualizing urban transformative capacity: A framework for research and policy Cities 51 121-undefined
[9]  
Chester MV(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Eisenberg DA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined