Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity

被引：9
作者：
Mouton C. [1 ]
Theisen D. [1 ]
Seil R. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Sports Medicine Research Laboratory, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg City
[2] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg–Clinique d’Eich, 76, rue d’Eich, Luxembourg City
来源：
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | 2016年 / 9卷 / 2期
关键词：
Anterior cruciate ligament; Diagnosis; Knee; Laxity; Reconstruction;
D O I：
10.1007/s12178-016-9332-0
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Several devices allow to measure anterior and rotational static knee laxity. To date, the use of rotational laxity measurements in the daily clinical practice however remains to be improved. These measurements may be systematically integrated to the follow-up of knee injuries. Physiologic laxity measurements may particularly be of interest for the identification of risk factors in athletes. Furthermore, knee laxity measurements help to improve the diagnosis of knee soft tissue injuries and to follow up reconstructions. Further prospective follow-ups of knee laxity in the injured/reconstructed knees are however required to conclude on the best treatment strategy for knee soft tissue injuries. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码：139 / 147
页数：8
相关论文
共 105 条
[91]  
Lee M.C., Seong S.C., Lee S., Et al., Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Arthroscopy, 23, 7, pp. 771-778, (2007)
[92]  
George M.S., Dunn W.R., Spindler K.P., Current concepts review: revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Am J Sports Med, 34, 12, pp. 2026-2037, (2006)
[93]  
Harter R.A., Osternig L.R., Singer K.M., Et al., Long-term evaluation of knee stability and function following surgical reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, Am J Sports Med, 16, 5, pp. 434-443, (1988)
[94]  
Ahlden M., Kartus J., Ejerhed L., Et al., Knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using either bone-patellar-tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autografts, with special emphasis on comparison over time, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 17, 9, pp. 1117-1124, (2009)
[95]  
Spindler K.P., Kuhn J.E., Freedman K.B., Et al., Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review, Am J Sports Med, 32, 8, pp. 1986-1995, (2004)
[96]  
Freedman K.B., D'Amato M.J., Nedeff D.D., Et al., Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts, Am J Sports Med, 31, 1, pp. 2-11, (2003)
[97]  
Goldblatt J.P., Fitzsimmons S.E., Balk E., Et al., Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis of patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft, Arthroscopy, 21, 7, pp. 791-803, (2005)
[98]  
Ghodadra N.S., Mall N.A., Grumet R., Et al., Interval arthrometric comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft: do grafts attenuate within the first year postoperatively?, Am J Sports Med, 40, 6, pp. 1347-1354, (2012)
[99]  
Mariscalco M.W., Magnussen R.A., Mehta D., Et al., Autograft versus nonirradiated allograft tissue for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review, Am J Sports Med, 42, 2, pp. 492-499, (2014)
[100]  
Kraeutler M.J., Bravman J.T., McCarty E.C., Bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft versus allograft in outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of 5182 patients, Am J Sports Med, 41, 10, pp. 2439-2448, (2013)
234567891011