Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity

被引：9
作者：
Mouton C. [1 ]
Theisen D. [1 ]
Seil R. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Sports Medicine Research Laboratory, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg City
[2] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg–Clinique d’Eich, 76, rue d’Eich, Luxembourg City
来源：
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | 2016年 / 9卷 / 2期
关键词：
Anterior cruciate ligament; Diagnosis; Knee; Laxity; Reconstruction;
D O I：
10.1007/s12178-016-9332-0
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Several devices allow to measure anterior and rotational static knee laxity. To date, the use of rotational laxity measurements in the daily clinical practice however remains to be improved. These measurements may be systematically integrated to the follow-up of knee injuries. Physiologic laxity measurements may particularly be of interest for the identification of risk factors in athletes. Furthermore, knee laxity measurements help to improve the diagnosis of knee soft tissue injuries and to follow up reconstructions. Further prospective follow-ups of knee laxity in the injured/reconstructed knees are however required to conclude on the best treatment strategy for knee soft tissue injuries. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码：139 / 147
页数：8
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]  
Musahl V., Seil R., Zaffagnini S., Et al., The role of static and dynamic rotatory laxity testing in evaluating ACL injury, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 20, 4, pp. 603-612, (2012)
[2]  
Halewood C., Amis A.A., Clinically relevant biomechanics of the knee capsule and ligaments, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 23, 10, pp. 2789-2796, (2015)
[3]  
Feller J., Hoser C., Webster K., EMG biofeedback assisted KT-1000 evaluation of anterior tibial displacement, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 8, 3, pp. 132-136, (2000)
[4]  
Fiebert I., Gresley J., Hoffman S., Et al., Comparative measurements of anterior tibial translation using the KT-1000 knee arthrometer with the leg in neutral, internal rotation, and external rotation, J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 19, 6, pp. 331-334, (1994)
[5]  
Daniel D.M., Malcom L.L., Losse G., Et al., Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 67, 5, pp. 720-726, (1985)
[6]  
Ballantyne B.T., French A.K., Heimsoth S.L., Et al., Influence of examiner experience and gender on interrater reliability of KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, Phys Ther, 75, 10, pp. 898-906, (1995)
[7]  
Sernert N., Helmers J., Kartus C., Et al., Knee-laxity measurements examined by a left-hand- and a right-hand-dominant physiotherapist, in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries and healthy controls, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 15, 10, pp. 1181-1186, (2007)
[8]  
Berry J., Kramer K., Binkley J., Et al., Error estimates in novice and expert raters for the KT-1000 arthrometer, J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 29, 1, pp. 49-55, (1999)
[9]  
King J.B., Kumar S.J., The Stryker knee arthrometer in clinical practice, Am J Sports Med, 17, 5, pp. 649-650, (1989)
[10]  
Highgenboten C.L., Jackson A., Meske N.B., Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons. Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects, Am J Sports Med, 17, 6, pp. 743-746, (1989)
12345678910