The addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin to low-dose Ara-C improves remission rate but does not significantly prolong survival in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: results from the LRF AML14 and NCRI AML16 pick-a-winner comparison

被引:0
作者
A K Burnett
R K Hills
A E Hunter
D Milligan
W J Kell
K Wheatley
J Yin
M F McMullin
H Dignum
D Bowen
N H Russell
机构
[1] Cardiff University School of Medicine,Department of Haematology
[2] Leicester Royal Infirmary,Department of Haematology
[3] Birmingham Heartlands Hospital,Department of Haematology
[4] University Hospital of Wales,Department of Haematology
[5] CRUK Clinical Trials Unit,Department of Haematology
[6] University of Birmingham,Department of Haematology
[7] Manchester Royal Infirmary,Department of Haematology
[8] Belfast City Hospital,Department of Haematology
[9] Queen Alexandra Hospital,Department of Haematology
[10] Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust,undefined
[11] Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust,undefined
来源
Leukemia | 2013年 / 27卷
关键词
clinical trial; gemtuzumab ozogamicin; AML;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia, who are not considered suitable for conventional intensive therapy, is unsatisfactory. Low-dose Ara-C(LDAC) has been established as superior to best supportive care, but only benefits the few patients who enter complete remission. Alternative or additional treatments are required to improve the situation. This randomised trial compared the addition of the immunoconjugate, gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), at a dose of 5 mg on day 1 of each course of LDAC, with the intention of improving the remission rate and consequently survival. Between June 2004 and June 2010, 495 patients entered the randomisation. The addition of GO significantly improved the remission rate (30% vs 17%; odds ratio(OR) 0.48 (0.32–0.73); P=0.006), but not the 12 month overall survival (25% vs 27%). The reason for the induction benefit failing to improve OS was two-fold: survival of patients in the LDAC arm who did not enter remission and survival after relapse were both superior in the LDAC arm. Although the addition of GO to LDAC doubled the remission rate it did not improve overall survival. Maintaining remission in older patients remains elusive.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 81
页数:6
相关论文
共 149 条
[41]  
Abels J(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[42]  
Debusscher L(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[43]  
Burnett AK(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[44]  
Milligan D(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[45]  
Goldstone A(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[46]  
Prentice A(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[47]  
McMullin MF(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[48]  
Dennis M(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[49]  
Burnett AK(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[50]  
Milligan D(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined