Kinematic assessment of the NOCSAE headform during blunt impacts with a pneumatic linear impactor

被引:0
作者
Elizabeth D. Edwards
Tiffany Landry
Mark Jesunathadas
Thomas A. Plaisted
Ryan J. Neice
Trenton E. Gould
Michael Kleinberger
Scotty G. Piland
机构
[1] The University of Southern Mississippi,School of Kinesiology and Nutrition
[2] Aberdeen Proving Ground,CCDC Army Research Laboratory, Weapons and Materials Research Directorate
来源
Sports Engineering | 2023年 / 26卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study is to explore the bilateral kinematic patterns across the posterior aspect of the medium National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment anthropomorphic test device headform during blunt impacts. Such information is important for interpreting and properly deriving blunt impact performance metrics. Two medium National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headforms modified according to National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment document ND-081 were attached to a male 50th percentile Hybrid III neck and were impacted at 14 locations along the posterior aspect of the headform (7 ear side, 7 non-ear side). Impacts were performed on a pneumatic linear impactor at 2, 3, and 4 m/s using the impactor head specified by the Standard Pneumatic Ram Test Method Document 081-18am. The peak linear acceleration, peak angular acceleration, and peak angular velocity values were quantified for each impact. The results indicate that peak linear acceleration seems to be consistent, peak angular acceleration is markedly less at the nape and rear regions, whereas peak angular velocity is greatest at the nape and rear regions. Additionally, there are numerous instances where the values between impacts to the ear side of the headform differ from impacts to the non-ear side according to our type-I error rate (alpha = 0.05). Our results provide an indication that there is a large variation in peak angular acceleration at different impact sites across the headform compared to little variation in peak linear and peak angular velocity. Additionally, there are some asymmetries present in the headform that may have clinical relevance for peak linear accelerations and peak angular accelerations, but not for peak angular velocity in the range of values we observed in this study.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]  
Yoganandan N(2009)Physical properties of the human head: mass, center of gravity and moment of inertia J Biomech 7 225-232
[2]  
Pintar FA(1975)National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment football helmet certification program Med Sci Sports 48 47-57
[3]  
Zhang J(2020)Development of the STAR evaluation system for assessing bicycle helmet protective performance Ann Biomed Eng 39 2130-2140
[4]  
Baisden JL(2011)Development of the STAR evaluation system for football helmets: integrating player head impact exposure and risk of concussion Ann Biomed Eng 230 50-60
[5]  
Hodgson VR(2016)Comparative analysis of helmeted impact response of Hybrid III and National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headforms J Sport Engin Tech 80 37-44
[6]  
Bland ML(2018)Comparison of NOCSAE head kinematics using the Hybrid III and EuroSID-2 necks J Biomech 42 5-10
[7]  
McNally C(2007)Measurement of impact acceleration: mouthpiece accelerometer versus helmet accelerometer J Athl Train 232 305-314
[8]  
Zuby DS(2018)Comparison of two anthropomorphic test devices using brain motion J Sport Eng Technol 40 1-13
[9]  
Meuller BC(2012)Rotational head kinematics in football impacts: an injury risk function for concussion Ann Biomed Eng 45 2146-2158
[10]  
Rowson S(2017)Predicting cumulative and maximum brain strain measures from Hybrid III head kinematics: a combined laboratory study and post-hoc regression analysis Ann Biomed Eng 8 309-236